Re: [PATCH 1/9] python: add a .gitignore file and refine the toplevel one

diff --git a/e6/f5254e5bd64bca3120c8cc1a258a3371bde0ba b/e6/f5254e5bd64bca3120c8cc1a258a3371bde0ba
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..c924918
--- /dev/null
+++ b/e6/f5254e5bd64bca3120c8cc1a258a3371bde0ba
@@ -0,0 +1,98 @@
+Return-Path: <teythoon@jade-hamburg.de>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EE7B431FD0\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 17:41:09 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0.001\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id y9dENhQDcxH8 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Thu, 29 Sep 2011 17:41:07 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from mail.cryptobitch.de (cryptobitch.de [88.198.7.68])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9EA3B431FB6\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 17:41:07 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from mail.jade-hamburg.de (unknown [85.183.11.228])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by mail.cryptobitch.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9F3F6505D09\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 02:41:05 +0200 (CEST)\r
+Received: by mail.jade-hamburg.de (Postfix, from userid 401)\r
+       id 01ABBDF2A0; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 02:41:04 +0200 (CEST)\r
+Received: from thinkbox.jade-hamburg.de (unknown\r
+       [IPv6:fe80::216:d3ff:fe3e:5058%br0])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: teythoon)\r
+       by mail.jade-hamburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1AAE0DF28B;\r
+       Fri, 30 Sep 2011 02:41:03 +0200 (CEST)\r
+Received: from teythoon by thinkbox.jade-hamburg.de with local (Exim 4.76)\r
+       (envelope-from <teythoon@thinkbox.jade-hamburg.de>)\r
+       id 1R9R9y-0003aa-Df; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 02:41:02 +0200\r
+Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6873622514054999627=="\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+In-Reply-To: <871uuzlrkt.fsf@SSpaeth.de>\r
+References:\r
+ <1316999137-28257-1-git-send-email-4winter@informatik.uni-hamburg.de>\r
+       <871uuzlrkt.fsf@SSpaeth.de>\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] python: add a .gitignore file and refine the toplevel\r
+       one\r
+To: Sebastian Spaeth <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+From: Justus Winter <4winter@informatik.uni-hamburg.de>\r
+Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 02:41:02 +0200\r
+Message-Id: <E1R9R9y-0003aa-Df@thinkbox.jade-hamburg.de>\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 00:41:09 -0000\r
+\r
+--===============6873622514054999627==\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
+\r
+\r
+Hi Sebastian,\r
+\r
+Quoting Sebastian Spaeth (2011-09-29 09:45:38)\r
+>Also, not all "status" are an error, e.g. DuplicateMessageId denotes\r
+>success rather than failure, it just communicates a status.\r
+\r
+I just stumbled upon the following comment in notmuch.h:\r
+\r
+/* Status codes used for the return values of most functions.\r
+ *\r
+ * A zero value (NOTMUCH_STATUS_SUCCESS) indicates that the function\r
+ * completed without error. Any other value indicates an error as\r
+ * follows:\r
+[...]\r
+\r
+Now I'm confused, could you clarify this?\r
+\r
+Thanks,\r
+Justus\r
+\r
+--===============6873622514054999627==\r
+Content-Type: application/octet-stream\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64\r
+Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=".signature"\r
+\r
+bG92ZSB1IGFsb3QgQCxACgo=\r
+\r
+--===============6873622514054999627==--\r