Re: Bug (?) difference 24.1 and 23.3.1

diff --git a/eb/94461d3aaaa70020f8df08a7aa43f8ffea0ffc b/eb/94461d3aaaa70020f8df08a7aa43f8ffea0ffc
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..6b91302
--- /dev/null
+++ b/eb/94461d3aaaa70020f8df08a7aa43f8ffea0ffc
@@ -0,0 +1,100 @@
+Return-Path: <svend@ciffer.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3597F431FB6\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue,  4 Sep 2012 12:04:06 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.7\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id gYayqiYhehBS for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Tue,  4 Sep 2012 12:04:05 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from mail-pb0-f53.google.com (mail-pb0-f53.google.com\r
+       [209.85.160.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 106B9431FAF\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue,  4 Sep 2012 12:04:04 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by pbbro2 with SMTP id ro2so11920985pbb.26\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 12:04:04 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;\r
+       d=google.com; s=20120113;\r
+       h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id\r
+       :mime-version:content-type:x-gm-message-state;\r
+       bh=CQcx8vutOlm/goP0IebA+E6LX+93PuGtSURmxS/hNec=;\r
+       b=W9i9z9Pv+3Ffk56ygv0RVrUbjZDUdNdyog+3Png/enIEXc6qMsxJk2xC0ATDjV+6yN\r
+       fyKZLieDFVwHYIWEDlCN+mRjoa25/HaM+vq7xeczk6I59AeBWLVJ5R6Z6TJblbro8MvC\r
+       /NpkGVBx88PEhrwXSr0Zehks7YCjzHYFJSqJG+aT51mnxRsnJ6OgjDvCadsp9y2aXZf0\r
+       Sq94GskHbuG2bkuuQgS4UfOUirOhhO5Z3yE3O33XmZyLHgW7bpfnneSoxCkyXAJVItze\r
+       zPnkKTCNFzGroGouSPGMFpS6GaXUf0J7VXBVAFMc01EDnRSTbfNmHuhKxSngMlmRf5rX\r
+       mnYg==\r
+Received: by 10.68.138.133 with SMTP id qq5mr47693826pbb.86.1346785443962;\r
+       Tue, 04 Sep 2012 12:04:03 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from localhost (cl-512.phx-01.us.sixxs.net. [2001:1938:81:1ff::2])\r
+       by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id sj5sm12754200pbc.30.2012.09.04.12.04.01\r
+       (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);\r
+       Tue, 04 Sep 2012 12:04:03 -0700 (PDT)\r
+From: Svend Sorensen <svend@ciffer.net>\r
+To: Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: Bug (?) difference 24.1 and 23.3.1\r
+In-Reply-To: <m2ehmnupdx.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>\r
+References: <m37gtg9qzq.fsf@quad.robs.office> <87ipcz9aro.fsf@ciffer.net>\r
+       <m2ehmnupdx.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.13.2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.2.50.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 12:04:00 -0700\r
+Message-ID: <87vcfta9un.fsf@finch.dhcp4.washington.edu>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+X-Gm-Message-State:\r
+ ALoCoQkKZuPT5U0MVXA1qiPaJbPVtSGLIETX4W/Hdxf1R2ZCS4x0TanYeSS5kadUvYcGw73BdbX+\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 19:04:06 -0000\r
+\r
+Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi> writes:\r
+\r
+> On Fri, Aug 03 2012, Svend Sorensen <svend@ciffer.net> wrote:\r
+>\r
+>>\r
+>> I was also getting an error about gnus-inhibit-images when running emacs\r
+>> 24. Adding (require 'gnus-art) to my emacs config fixed the problem.\r
+>\r
+> Where is your emacs24 from? From Debian sid?\r
+\r
+I was using the emacs-snapshot package on Debian squeeze when I ran into\r
+this problem. I am now using the emacs-snapshot package on Debian\r
+testing (wheezy).\r
+\r
+http://emacs.naquadah.org/\r
+\r
+Svend\r
+\r
+> David has some gnus-inhibit-images related tests failing on his\r
+> system and he is using emacs24 from debian sid. My\r
+> gnus-inhibit-images related emacs24 tests don't fail (I've compiled\r
+> emacs 24.1 & emacs 24.2 from source). Also buildbot at\r
+> http://notmuch.hocat.ca/builders/master-emacs24/builds/173\r
+> have now successful build (we assume it uses emacs24 from gentoo\r
+> -- until Tom verifies this).\r
+>\r
+>>\r
+>> http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/2012/008405.html\r
+>>\r
+>> Svend\r
+>\r
+> Tomi\r