Re: [alot] Introducing myself, asking various questions

diff --git a/d8/3bbd53abee176d0b18053dbb50ab98a98b929d b/d8/3bbd53abee176d0b18053dbb50ab98a98b929d
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..42705af
--- /dev/null
+++ b/d8/3bbd53abee176d0b18053dbb50ab98a98b929d
@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
+Return-Path: <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E206431FD0\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 09:55:59 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.799\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,\r
+       FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id vodYFxyyBBx6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Thu, 22 Dec 2011 09:55:58 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from mail-ey0-f181.google.com (mail-ey0-f181.google.com\r
+       [209.85.215.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89134431FB6\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 09:55:58 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: by eaai1 with SMTP id i1so2741607eaa.26\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 09:55:56 -0800 (PST)\r
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;\r
+       h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to\r
+       :cc:content-type;\r
+       bh=w/+Vl3kESiadCt80C2gkKRqXuBH5L/eR6D9gmrAZ62E=;\r
+       b=Hniv85k3GPQ9JRPrlRxOUaNATwtWfkuJGiiDBF6oML0N/Bn8JKOz1jDX6i3saXoZiQ\r
+       jiHLJk90kNWdWBcoslcQgvCnrRp9qtZwYJw/diLgiwVpxutldPpiHLh4l0ZrqAqDNTt1\r
+       l3/TnvEukyLZWtFWPqh4ZWdFxog5JlGLtWO7U=\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Received: by 10.204.152.136 with SMTP id g8mr3417015bkw.127.1324576555941;\r
+       Thu, 22 Dec 2011 09:55:55 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: by 10.204.197.201 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 09:55:55 -0800 (PST)\r
+In-Reply-To: <4eee3fe5.8bcbe30a.6d78.1918@mx.google.com>\r
+References:\r
+ <CANcQd8POazwALwAodK=hnaD7OyxhJD_awJ+J-f0+Ek8_0yNEMA@mail.gmail.com>\r
+       <4eee3fe5.8bcbe30a.6d78.1918@mx.google.com>\r
+Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 19:55:55 +0200\r
+Message-ID:\r
+ <CAMP44s24dfL0ZYcXqNSfbgHEthuZYHPu-OuBx38SF7oOtuatOw@mail.gmail.com>\r
+Subject: Re: [alot] Introducing myself, asking various questions\r
+From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>\r
+To: Patrick Totzke <patricktotzke@googlemail.com>\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\r
+Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 17:55:59 -0000\r
+\r
+On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 9:32 PM, Patrick Totzke\r
+<patricktotzke@googlemail.com> wrote:\r
+>>.. however I have the\r
+>>impression that it may be trying to do too much for my needs, which may\r
+>>be peculiar. I have installed offlineimap+notmuch+alot on a slow laptop\r
+>>running Debian wheezy.\r
+\r
+> I guess most of us use offlineimap or getmail in combination\r
+> with notmuch. And Debian is also popular choice afaik,\r
+> so you're in good company :)\r
+\r
+Personally I prefer mbsync (isync) because it's much more efficient,\r
+and it's not written in python :)\r
+\r
+-- \r
+Felipe Contreras\r