Re: storing From and Subject in xapian
authorJameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>
Mon, 9 May 2011 05:00:26 +0000 (22:00 +1700)
committerW. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
Fri, 7 Nov 2014 17:38:11 +0000 (09:38 -0800)
5d/fa554cc2e21b135541423022029058ad3af305 [new file with mode: 0644]

diff --git a/5d/fa554cc2e21b135541423022029058ad3af305 b/5d/fa554cc2e21b135541423022029058ad3af305
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..6f957d0
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
+Return-Path: <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 310AF429E20\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun,  8 May 2011 22:00:34 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -2.29\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id AiQIPV3VNtZ9 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Sun,  8 May 2011 22:00:33 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu\r
+       [131.215.239.19])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA993431FB5\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun,  8 May 2011 22:00:33 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from earth-doxen.imss.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by earth-doxen-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D0E066E043C;\r
+       Sun,  8 May 2011 22:00:32 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-IMSS on earth-doxen by amavisd-new\r
+Received: from servo.finestructure.net (cpe-98-149-172-122.socal.res.rr.com\r
+       [98.149.172.122]) (Authenticated sender: jrollins)\r
+       by earth-doxen-submit (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33F6E66E02B3;\r
+       Sun,  8 May 2011 22:00:28 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by servo.finestructure.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)\r
+       id A3536303; Sun,  8 May 2011 22:00:28 -0700 (PDT)\r
+From: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+To: Austin Clements <amdragon@mit.edu>, Istvan Marko <notmuch@kismala.com>\r
+Subject: Re: storing From and Subject in xapian\r
+In-Reply-To: <BANLkTimvs8ttQCL0AK9UrjcxxgaeqQ9fSg@mail.gmail.com>\r
+References: <m3sjsv2kw2.fsf@zsu.kismala.com>\r
+       <BANLkTimvs8ttQCL0AK9UrjcxxgaeqQ9fSg@mail.gmail.com>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.6 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Sun, 08 May 2011 22:00:26 -0700\r
+Message-ID: <87zkmwsc2d.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
+       micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
+Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 May 2011 05:00:34 -0000\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+\r
+On Wed, 4 May 2011 21:48:39 -0400, Austin Clements <amdragon@mit.edu> wrote:\r
+> This is awesome.  What was your machine configuration?\r
+\r
+Does anyone else have an opinions about this patch?  It seems reasonable\r
+to me (other than a couple errant comments that were left in and should\r
+be removed).  It seems worth the slight increase in database size for\r
+such a nice performance improvement.\r
+\r
+Unless I hear a strong positive response I'll hold off on considering it\r
+for 0.6, and suggest instead targeting it for 0.7.\r
+\r
+jamie.\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)\r
+\r
+iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJNx3TqAAoJEO00zqvie6q8UD0QAJoz+xxquHzWgKSyVm1WnSZL\r
+W8BQjAQ9c7mWF596UgdQO3azC3w2DELac5c8hPTIAW/jhUoh5oY6dPj4qkWZYO8I\r
+IcY3AnqwkaaM0NVazdzjIP9jmvJiZXrA/P/hS2RuI9/PxiHW/FMiHHj6atrvl+J9\r
+yMGJ++mIduo7qijGvtBTn07dMNBM1nlz7zQNu6RLSRrWXLrU02uCn7qNE9dJ9szw\r
+m8DoUnZfJ29QGmRwUF/rsskv+lIr1LISWgyqhoZaAcTxP862/G5uSOxnaqx4xBsZ\r
+2U80DCLphkLbApezUazVIR45gzDjNBhihf2LFcoRAtJ428gTEmm198mkH92jQQDc\r
+VJZWlPlGznul1eraS5TSvCWsIqkNubOVsSOcB9/dRMCAkh2RY1Jle0DIJTn3izY8\r
+G646A0KN50ibouq8maZcq7wE3rpXGlnjy5z5EXFozTtRDfgcNI7sdWR9jAV2RpnH\r
+uMuxXdlaJxqcFGy2W/VlqHKv/jVgFSfCFtnzSlXw3wdcPWynECwgTgVeKx2nyHar\r
+M81xk+Nkw8vL8EQrrGysl/y4A8RCcArBKlOCzgARmia5B+0rlrXkaYuxHQW7A1eD\r
+FhRN+zn/mDu2a3COwwDE8eVAYv9k75b/ttRNSIM3p60oMBZkKE7wBltNdejP8tN1\r
+BxwJC/OvnFAJJH7U3msd\r
+=ka77\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+--=-=-=--\r