Re: emacs: notmuch-tree, reading messages and tags

diff --git a/0b/12ff2d2195851d8e409527de6dba1a25bd981d b/0b/12ff2d2195851d8e409527de6dba1a25bd981d
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..1309779
--- /dev/null
+++ b/0b/12ff2d2195851d8e409527de6dba1a25bd981d
@@ -0,0 +1,111 @@
+Return-Path: <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D879431FBC\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 06:52:32 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 1.34\r
+X-Spam-Level: *\r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.34 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL=2.438,\r
+       FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3]\r
+       autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id a+Dx4XO6bw2m for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Wed, 11 Mar 2015 06:52:29 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from mail2.qmul.ac.uk (mail2.qmul.ac.uk [138.37.6.6])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40038431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 06:52:29 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from smtp.qmul.ac.uk ([138.37.6.40])\r
+       by mail2.qmul.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.71)\r
+       (envelope-from <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>)\r
+       id 1YVh3c-0006wn-SU; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 13:52:23 +0000\r
+Received: from 5751dfa2.skybroadband.com ([87.81.223.162] helo=localhost)\r
+       by smtp.qmul.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.71)\r
+       (envelope-from <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>)\r
+       id 1YVh3c-0007hU-Lg; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 13:52:20 +0000\r
+From: Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>\r
+To: matt@bubblegen.co.uk, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: emacs: notmuch-tree, reading messages and tags\r
+In-Reply-To: <97881ceaba7c5057e21676c4102c5c7d.squirrel@webmail.plus.net>\r
+References: <97881ceaba7c5057e21676c4102c5c7d.squirrel@webmail.plus.net>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.18.1+86~gef5e66a (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.4.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 13:52:57 +0000\r
+Message-ID: <87sidbej46.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+X-Sender-Host-Address: 87.81.223.162\r
+X-QM-Geographic: According to ripencc,\r
+       this message was delivered by a machine in Britain (UK) (GB).\r
+X-QM-SPAM-Info: Sender has good ham record.  :)\r
+X-QM-Body-MD5: 1e6bc1706de76ecbf85241efbec6083f (of first 20000 bytes)\r
+X-SpamAssassin-Score: -0.0\r
+X-SpamAssassin-SpamBar: /\r
+X-SpamAssassin-Report: The QM spam filters have analysed this message to\r
+       determine if it is\r
+       spam. We require at least 5.0 points to mark a message as spam.\r
+       This message scored -0.0 points.\r
+       Summary of the scoring: \r
+       * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail\r
+       provider *      (markwalters1009[at]gmail.com)\r
+       * -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay\r
+       *      domain\r
+X-QM-Scan-Virus: ClamAV says the message is clean\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 13:52:32 -0000\r
+\r
+\r
+Hi\r
+\r
+I think that is a bug (my fault) which happened when the unread tag\r
+handling went in. I will try and fix it.\r
+\r
+Incidentally you can scroll the message pane with space and b without\r
+having to switch frames.\r
+\r
+Best wishes\r
+\r
+Mark\r
+\r
+On Wed, 11 Mar 2015, Matthew Lear <matt@bubblegen.co.uk> wrote:\r
+> Hi,\r
+> If I switch to viewing a thread with notmuch-tree, I can navigate through,\r
+> and read messages using up/down + RET just fine. Each message is shown in\r
+> a seperate window. However, if point never enters that message window, the\r
+> unread tag is removed (strikethrough) from the message in the notmuch-tree\r
+> view but not from the message in the message window itself. If I refresh\r
+> the notmuch tree view, all messages still have their unread tag applied.\r
+>\r
+> The only time that the unread tag is removed is if point enters the\r
+> message window. For messages that are only a few lines long (eg a reply to\r
+> the previous message in the thread is only a few lines) and which can be\r
+> read without putting point in the message window to scroll, having to\r
+> specifically select the message window in order for the unread tag to be\r
+> removed from the message seems totally unnecessary and is inconvenient.\r
+>\r
+> Is this by design or am I using it wrongly? Is this behaviour configurable?\r
+>\r
+> Cheers,\r
+> --  Matt\r
+>\r
+> _______________________________________________\r
+> notmuch mailing list\r
+> notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+> http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch\r