Re: priorities for 0.13

diff --git a/06/11bf7427b94f643d9766e87dea05d71d605b3d b/06/11bf7427b94f643d9766e87dea05d71d605b3d
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..af3eca1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/06/11bf7427b94f643d9766e87dea05d71d605b3d
@@ -0,0 +1,100 @@
+Return-Path: <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CACB6431FB6\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 10:37:14 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 1.401\r
+X-Spam-Level: *\r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.401 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,\r
+       FREEMAIL_REPLY=2.499, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3]\r
+       autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id 1daNPuzmsI9u for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Wed, 25 Apr 2012 10:37:14 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from mail2.qmul.ac.uk (mail2.qmul.ac.uk [138.37.6.6])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FC3C431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 10:37:14 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from smtp.qmul.ac.uk ([138.37.6.40])\r
+       by mail2.qmul.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.71)\r
+       (envelope-from <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>)\r
+       id 1SN69N-00024d-Or; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 18:37:10 +0100\r
+Received: from 94-192-233-223.zone6.bethere.co.uk ([94.192.233.223]\r
+       helo=localhost)\r
+       by smtp.qmul.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.69)\r
+       (envelope-from <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>)\r
+       id 1SN69N-0003xU-AB; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 18:37:09 +0100\r
+From: Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>\r
+To: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>, notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+Subject: Re: priorities for 0.13\r
+In-Reply-To: <878vhkvvqi.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+References: <878vhkvvqi.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.12+128~g0f26d91 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 18:37:27 +0100\r
+Message-ID: <87397r4srs.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+X-Sender-Host-Address: 94.192.233.223\r
+X-QM-SPAM-Info: Sender has good ham record.  :)\r
+X-QM-Body-MD5: c64479a90d76d32b2991778c015f0947 (of first 20000 bytes)\r
+X-SpamAssassin-Score: -1.2\r
+X-SpamAssassin-SpamBar: -\r
+X-SpamAssassin-Report: The QM spam filters have analysed this message to\r
+       determine if it is\r
+       spam. We require at least 5.0 points to mark a message as spam.\r
+       This message scored -1.2 points.\r
+       Summary of the scoring: \r
+       * -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,\r
+       *      medium trust\r
+       *      [138.37.6.40 listed in list.dnswl.org]\r
+       * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail\r
+       provider *      (markwalters1009[at]gmail.com)\r
+       * -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay\r
+       *      domain\r
+       *  1.0 FREEMAIL_REPLY From and body contain different freemails\r
+       *  0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list\r
+X-QM-Scan-Virus: ClamAV says the message is clean\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 17:37:14 -0000\r
+\r
+\r
+On Wed, 25 Apr 2012, David Bremner <david@tethera.net> wrote:\r
+> Hi All;\r
+>\r
+> I'd like to have a feature freeze for 0.13 sometime in the first week of\r
+> May.  What do people feel are priorities to try to get reviewed and\r
+> pushed for 0.13?\r
+\r
+I would like\r
+id:"1331836090-30560-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com" as I\r
+think that is pretty close to the final piece for the exclude stuff.\r
+\r
+I also think that\r
+id:"1334431301-27303-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com" (which\r
+doesn't apply to master but I have a rebased version) makes excludes\r
+rather nicer. If anyone thinks that might be plausible I will post the\r
+rebased version.\r
+\r
+Finally, I agree that I would like to see the html reply stuff.\r
+\r
+Best wishes\r
+\r
+Mark\r