Re: notmuch search --output=files error with AND NOT search terms

diff --git a/50/e9043564777f9bf52ceb2f7557a19fcd6e7ed6 b/50/e9043564777f9bf52ceb2f7557a19fcd6e7ed6
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..3ba0fb0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/50/e9043564777f9bf52ceb2f7557a19fcd6e7ed6
@@ -0,0 +1,120 @@
+Return-Path: <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6401E431FB6\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue,  9 Jul 2013 11:38:02 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -1.098\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,\r
+       NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id MUh9D5mRF4ft for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Tue,  9 Jul 2013 11:37:55 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from mail2.qmul.ac.uk (mail2.qmul.ac.uk [138.37.6.6])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1865B431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue,  9 Jul 2013 11:37:55 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from smtp.qmul.ac.uk ([138.37.6.40])\r
+       by mail2.qmul.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.71)\r
+       (envelope-from <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>)\r
+       id 1UwcnM-0002Kn-Dw; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 19:37:51 +0100\r
+Received: from 93-97-24-31.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.24.31] helo=localhost)\r
+       by smtp.qmul.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.71)\r
+       (envelope-from <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>)\r
+       id 1UwcnM-0004cR-5l; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 19:37:48 +0100\r
+From: Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>\r
+To: Ingo Hohmann <mail1@2b1.de>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: notmuch search --output=files    error with AND NOT search terms\r
+In-Reply-To: <51DC0A16.5080704@2b1.de>\r
+References: <51DC0A16.5080704@2b1.de>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.15.2+192~g8222af3 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1\r
+       (i486-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 19:37:46 +0100\r
+Message-ID: <87mwpvd1fp.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+X-Sender-Host-Address: 93.97.24.31\r
+X-QM-SPAM-Info: Sender has good ham record.  :)\r
+X-QM-Body-MD5: 1d3f1ed18b338575d78a58cfd1301790 (of first 20000 bytes)\r
+X-SpamAssassin-Score: 0.0\r
+X-SpamAssassin-SpamBar: /\r
+X-SpamAssassin-Report: The QM spam filters have analysed this message to\r
+       determine if it is\r
+       spam. We require at least 5.0 points to mark a message as spam.\r
+       This message scored 0.0 points. Summary of the scoring: \r
+       * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail\r
+       provider *      (markwalters1009[at]gmail.com)\r
+       *  0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list\r
+X-QM-Scan-Virus: ClamAV says the message is clean\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 18:38:02 -0000\r
+\r
+\r
+Hi\r
+\r
+> Hi list,\r
+>\r
+> I am trying to check for mails, that are tagged differently from their \r
+> mailfolder.\r
+>\r
+> So I am searching like this, for example:\r
+>\r
+>      notmuch search   folder:1_Personal AND NOT tag:1_Personal\r
+>      thread:0000000000005613   2008-01-15 [1/1] KIKIDAN News; kikidan \r
+> news 2008/01: Willkommen im neuen Jahr (inbox to-me)\r
+>\r
+> That's OK, but if I want to get the file name of the message, suddenly \r
+> get another message, which isn't located in the 1_Personal folder at all.\r
+>\r
+>      notmuch search --output=files   folder:1_Personal AND NOT \r
+> tag:1_Personal\r
+> /home/ianus/Mail/ingo-2b1-de/INBOX/cur/1362131239_2.9026.cordraconis,U=33535,FMD5=7e33429f656f1e6e9d79b29c3f82c57e:2,S\r
+> /home/ianus/Mail/ingo-2b1-de/1_Personal/cur/1361052415_0.30588.cordraconis,U=755,FMD5=2bd412d62930ab474a218128a61bdb68:2,S\r
+>\r
+\r
+The most likely cause is that these two messagefiles have the same\r
+message-ids (so in notmuch's view are the same message). Try\r
+\r
+notmuch search --output=messages  folder:1_Personal AND NOT tag:1_Personal\r
+\r
+If you only see one message-id then notmuch thinks there is a single message\r
+that matches the search. The way notmuch works is that it first finds\r
+which messages match and then prints the requested information for those\r
+messages. So in this case it finds the matching message(s) then prints\r
+all filenames for those matching messages.\r
+\r
+There are some patches floating around for improvements to the manpage\r
+but they haven't been applied/reviewed yet.\r
+\r
+Best wishes\r
+\r
+Mark\r
+\r
+\r
+>\r
+> Kind regards,\r
+>\r
+> Ingo\r
+>\r
+>\r
+> _______________________________________________\r
+> notmuch mailing list\r
+> notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+> http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch\r