Re: performance-test/README gpg key outdated?

diff --git a/40/14fa2c6c76feff584295b4298a291e9dea85ab b/40/14fa2c6c76feff584295b4298a291e9dea85ab
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..0176088
--- /dev/null
+++ b/40/14fa2c6c76feff584295b4298a291e9dea85ab
@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
+Return-Path: <david@tethera.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC491431FAF\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 02:22:24 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]\r
+       autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id QlJIZno7orBN for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Tue, 21 Oct 2014 02:22:17 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from yantan.tethera.net (yantan.tethera.net [199.188.72.155])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4E53431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 02:22:17 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from remotemail by yantan.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.80)\r
+       (envelope-from <david@tethera.net>)\r
+       id 1XgVdu-0005EK-Qc; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 06:22:14 -0300\r
+Received: (nullmailer pid 14439 invoked by uid 1000); Tue, 21 Oct 2014\r
+       09:22:09 -0000\r
+From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>\r
+To: Gaute Hope <eg@gaute.vetsj.com>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: performance-test/README gpg key outdated?\r
+In-Reply-To: <1413880475-astroid-0-wpmn76icgq-3860@strange>\r
+References: <1413880475-astroid-0-wpmn76icgq-3860@strange>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.18.1+131~gdd8373f (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:22:09 +0200\r
+Message-ID: <87siih93r2.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 09:22:25 -0000\r
+\r
+Gaute Hope <eg@gaute.vetsj.com> writes:\r
+\r
+> Hi,\r
+>\r
+> seems like the info about the gpg key for David Bremner is outdated in\r
+> the file performance-test/README (fingerprint does not match). At least\r
+> there exists a newer key at pgp.mit.edu, am I being scammed?\r
+\r
+I have multiple keys, but the older one has not yet been revoked.\r
+\r
+For me, verification works fine with both keys in my keyring.\r
+d\r