Re: notmuch-reply doesn't use Reply-To

diff --git a/fc/d17f7185aa36d739a3cc54947feca55ab459fc b/fc/d17f7185aa36d739a3cc54947feca55ab459fc
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..b4b4e0f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/fc/d17f7185aa36d739a3cc54947feca55ab459fc
@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
+Return-Path: <david@tethera.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 841D86DE1769\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri,  4 Dec 2015 09:14:35 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.321\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.321 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.230,\r
+  RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.55, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id pZBnnbsI-gjt for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Fri,  4 Dec 2015 09:14:33 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from fethera.tethera.net (fethera.tethera.net [198.245.60.197])\r
+ by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A1B36DE1704\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri,  4 Dec 2015 09:14:33 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from remotemail by fethera.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.84)\r
+ (envelope-from <david@tethera.net>)\r
+ id 1a4twC-0002H8-9G; Fri, 04 Dec 2015 12:14:28 -0500\r
+Received: (nullmailer pid 1396 invoked by uid 1000);\r
+ Fri, 04 Dec 2015 17:14:26 -0000\r
+From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>\r
+To: Damien Cassou <damien@cassou.me>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: notmuch-reply doesn't use Reply-To\r
+In-Reply-To: <87fuzi9ng5.fsf@cassou.me>\r
+References: <8737vjcx9b.fsf@cassou.me> <8737vi8l7j.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+ <87fuzi9ng5.fsf@cassou.me>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.21+5~gca076ce (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.4.1\r
+ (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2015 13:14:26 -0400\r
+Message-ID: <87si3ijfv1.fsf@tesseract.cs.unb.ca>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2015 17:14:35 -0000\r
+\r
+Damien Cassou <damien@cassou.me> writes:\r
+\r
+>\r
+> The last sentence seems to contradict my example:\r
+>\r
+>     Note that the address in the Reply-To header will always appear in\r
+>     the reply.\r
+>\r
+\r
+The feature, and the comment, predate the "--reply-to=sender" option so\r
+maybe something needs to be updated.\r
+\r
+d\r