Re: T070 tests portability

diff --git a/5e/61fa0466b8e74d474188ae59ca31d488c93679 b/5e/61fa0466b8e74d474188ae59ca31d488c93679
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..ac82b8d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/5e/61fa0466b8e74d474188ae59ca31d488c93679
@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
+Return-Path: <david@tethera.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47EAC6DE138F\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue,  5 Jan 2016 13:41:16 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.31\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.31 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.241, \r
+ RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.55, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id DSDoWqI7aGGx for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Tue,  5 Jan 2016 13:41:13 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from fethera.tethera.net (fethera.tethera.net [198.245.60.197])\r
+ by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98D766DE1016\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue,  5 Jan 2016 13:41:13 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from remotemail by fethera.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.84)\r
+ (envelope-from <david@tethera.net>)\r
+ id 1aGZLg-0000cC-4b; Tue, 05 Jan 2016 16:41:00 -0500\r
+Received: (nullmailer pid 11898 invoked by uid 1000);\r
+ Tue, 05 Jan 2016 21:41:06 -0000\r
+From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>\r
+To: Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>,\r
+ J Farkas <jf.hyqohaczlksw4tx6ae@l2015aftruuq.dns007.net>,\r
+ notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: T070 tests portability\r
+In-Reply-To: <m2io37agl8.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>\r
+References: <1451991305.14.acc64b88@201601.l2015aftruuq.dns007.net>\r
+ <m2io37agl8.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.21+26~g9404723 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1\r
+ (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 17:41:06 -0400\r
+Message-ID: <87ziwj9025.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 21:41:16 -0000\r
+\r
+Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi> writes:\r
+\r
+> The page https://sourceware.org/gdb/onlinedocs/gdb/Returning.html\r
+> talks something about gdb not knowing the return type if function\r
+> was compiled without debug info... well, is this is the reason,\r
+> perhaps we should allow testing w/o debug info compiled in.\r
+\r
+The test suite overall assumes debug info is present; T000-basic tests\r
+for this.\r
+\r
+d\r
+\r