Re: Bug/Issue: References header doesn't wrap in emacs package

diff --git a/02/0caca95370956ba1e48264bbfd244d76a5f6a6 b/02/0caca95370956ba1e48264bbfd244d76a5f6a6
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..ccb5aa1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/02/0caca95370956ba1e48264bbfd244d76a5f6a6
@@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
+Return-Path: <david@tethera.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4F706DE02D2\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri,  2 Oct 2015 18:22:52 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0.476\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.476 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.268,\r
+  URIBL_SBL=0.644, URIBL_SBL_A=0.1] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id yJ8vetzyWz3y for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Fri,  2 Oct 2015 18:22:50 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from gitolite.debian.net (gitolite.debian.net [87.98.215.224])\r
+ by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E00E6DE01F5\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri,  2 Oct 2015 18:22:49 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from remotemail by gitolite.debian.net with local (Exim 4.80)\r
+ (envelope-from <david@tethera.net>)\r
+ id 1ZiBWA-0004GF-JE; Sat, 03 Oct 2015 01:21:42 +0000\r
+Received: (nullmailer pid 4511 invoked by uid 1000); Sat, 03 Oct 2015\r
+ 01:21:23 -0000\r
+From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>\r
+To: Allan Streib <astreib@indiana.edu>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: Bug/Issue: References header doesn't wrap in emacs package\r
+In-Reply-To: <87si5t1nhu.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+References: <87612qwh04.fsf@viking.dsc.soic.indiana.edu>\r
+ <87si5t1nhu.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.20.2+93~g33c8777 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1\r
+ (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2015 22:21:23 -0300\r
+Message-ID: <878u7k21d8.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2015 01:22:52 -0000\r
+\r
+David Bremner <david@tethera.net> writes:\r
+\r
+> Allan Streib <astreib@indiana.edu> writes:\r
+>\r
+>> Notmuch/0.20.2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.4.1\r
+>>\r
+>> Replying to a message in a deeply nested thread can trigger a complaint:\r
+>>\r
+>>   sendmail: command failed: 550 5.7.1 Delivery not authorized, message refused: Message is not RFC 2822 compliant\r
+>>\r
+>> The problem is a References header that is too long/not wrapped.\r
+>>\r
+>\r
+> Hi Allan;\r
+>\r
+> Thanks for the report.  I can see how notmuch-reply would generate a\r
+> long references header in that situation. We rely on message-mode (part\r
+> of Gnus) to actually send the message, and it isn't clear to me yet if\r
+> message-mode (or some function it invokes) normally folds long headers.\r
+\r
+I have reported this as an emacs bug.\r
+\r
+  http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=21608\r