--- /dev/null
+Return-Path: <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 755C26DE0AC2\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 13 Dec 2015 02:59:56 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0.694\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.694 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.042, \r
+ SPF_NEUTRAL=0.652] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id ccBCwunNNqe2 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Sun, 13 Dec 2015 02:59:54 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (guru.guru-group.fi [46.183.73.34])\r
+ by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BEDD6DE005F\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 13 Dec 2015 02:59:53 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (localhost [IPv6:::1])\r
+ by guru.guru-group.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCE9D10005A;\r
+ Sun, 13 Dec 2015 13:00:05 +0200 (EET)\r
+From: Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>\r
+To: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>,\r
+ Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>,\r
+ Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/9] add a gpg_path value for notmuch_database_t\r
+In-Reply-To: <87d1ubdu0k.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+References: <1449718786-28000-1-git-send-email-dkg@fifthhorseman.net>\r
+ <1449718786-28000-8-git-send-email-dkg@fifthhorseman.net>\r
+ <m21tas7ifa.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi> <87mvtgfws4.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net>\r
+ <87d1ubdu0k.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.21+32~g73439f8 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1\r
+ (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)\r
+X-Face: HhBM'cA~<r"^Xv\KRN0P{vn'Y"Kd;zg_y3S[4)KSN~s?O\"QPoL\r
+ $[Xv_BD:i/F$WiEWax}R(MPS`^UaptOGD`*/=@\1lKoVa9tnrg0TW?"r7aRtgk[F\r
+ !)g;OY^,BjTbr)Np:%c_o'jj,Z\r
+Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2015 13:00:05 +0200\r
+Message-ID: <m24mfmbolm.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2015 10:59:56 -0000\r
+\r
+On Sun, Dec 13 2015, David Bremner <david@tethera.net> wrote:\r
+\r
+> Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net> writes:\r
+>\r
+>> On Fri 2015-12-11 17:02:33 -0500, Tomi Ollila wrote:\r
+>>> The above code finds gpg/gpg2 (when called w/ these args) from\r
+>>> _CS_PATH (seems to be /bin:/usr/bin by default in linux (tried to\r
+>>> look how this set in *BSD -- initially it looks like /usr/local/bin\r
+>>> not included but... maybe we let them to complain if this is the case\r
+>>> ... :/)\r
+>>> ... anyway, the full found path is not set anywhere -- how is it found\r
+>>> when used (exec*p() using $PATH? :O)\r
+>>\r
+>> Hm, according to exec(3):\r
+>>\r
+>> Special semantics for execlp() and execvp()\r
+>> The execlp(), execvp(), and execvpe() functions duplicate the\r
+>> actions of the shell in searching for an executable file if the\r
+>> specified filename does not contain a slash (/) character. The\r
+>> file is sought in the colon-separated list of directory pathnames\r
+>> specified in the PATH environment variable. If this variable\r
+>> isn't defined, the path list defaults to the current directory\r
+>> followed by the list of directories returned by\r
+>> confstr(_CS_PATH). (This confstr(3) call typically returns the\r
+>> value "/bin:/usr/bin".)\r
+>>\r
+>> So this code probably also ought to be searching $PATH as well. yuck.\r
+>> You'd think there would be a commonly-available function for doing this\r
+>> specific check without having to actually try to exec() something.\r
+>\r
+> Without weighing in on the advisibility of searching for gpg in $PATH,\r
+> there is a glib function g_find_program_in_path. We're already linking\r
+> to glib (because of gmime mainly, but it's used other places as well).\r
+\r
+glib2-2.38 (glib/gutils.c) seems to look in PATH, and if \r
+g_getenv ("PATH") == NULL uses hardcoded path "/bin:/usr/bin:.";\r
+(it us "security" feature to have '.' last...)\r
+\r
+If rest is TL;DR; I'd suggest we use this... since libgpgme has implemented\r
+it IMO too late for use in 2016 (or do additional compat function?)\r
+\r
+> The other point that occurs to me is that libgpgme solves this same\r
+> problem in src/posix-util.c. It also seems to search path, at least\r
+> optionally, although only if it cannot find gpgconf.\r
+\r
+On Fedora 20 I looked gpgme-1.3.2 sources -- in there I could not find\r
+this search using PATH... gpg-1.3.2 is released 2012-05-02...\r
+\r
+Jessie (lib)gpgme 1.5.1 (2014-07-30) seems to have the code David mentioned...\r
+(btw. I was suprisingly hard to search Debian packages; IIRC it was easier)\r
+\r
+Ubuntu 14.04 LTS has (lib)gpgme 1.4.3 (ubuntu5). I did not download that\r
+source... but 1.5.1 NEWS indicates that this PATH search has arrived to\r
+1.5.0 (2014-05-21)\r
+\r
+This search is different from glib2-version that if getenv("PATH") == NULL\r
+search only "/bin:/usr/bin"\r
+\r