Re: Notmuch indexing 21 million emails

diff --git a/88/9afeb260ca120962d903e94043984426f93817 b/88/9afeb260ca120962d903e94043984426f93817
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..1934ae6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/88/9afeb260ca120962d903e94043984426f93817
@@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
+Return-Path: <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D83BD429E3E\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 07:40:07 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.799\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,\r
+       FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id zZEGzhGvt3Bg for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Wed, 23 Nov 2011 07:40:07 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from mail-qy0-f181.google.com (mail-qy0-f181.google.com\r
+       [209.85.216.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77498431FB6\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 07:40:07 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: by qyc1 with SMTP id 1so1708633qyc.26\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 07:40:04 -0800 (PST)\r
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;\r
+       h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to\r
+       :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;\r
+       bh=35LD6pY6tRJRt7QwqZdzf5lPKtMZ/M8WEVT5dM1Bkxo=;\r
+       b=dXm+zxVNDlJzsb22QyFImoAL49GszZvZywrezQl07Ari/H13qOS0TspQUwRI9cpbNn\r
+       Hp5HU1O6H2F7D+cibPoSgkidf1/5iAuVX07OKyzY0llKWHPfC5B8LmdHowk/IZIkEi+r\r
+       O0DPKMflIYmlonkvOPB90H4Mxq0rCoRMdH/Ak=\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Received: by 10.68.30.193 with SMTP id u1mr8976999pbh.93.1322062804539; Wed,\r
+       23 Nov 2011 07:40:04 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: by 10.68.58.38 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 07:40:04 -0800 (PST)\r
+In-Reply-To: <1321930927.73603.YahooMailNeo@web36506.mail.mud.yahoo.com>\r
+References: <1321930927.73603.YahooMailNeo@web36506.mail.mud.yahoo.com>\r
+Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 17:40:04 +0200\r
+Message-ID:\r
+ <CAMP44s2zf-OpN4u+zv1g+q_nrgkMHUGLUT7cVFZMJ=Xdy-9WdA@mail.gmail.com>\r
+Subject: Re: Notmuch indexing 21 million emails\r
+From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>\r
+To: Tom Bulli <mrbulli@yahoo.com>\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
+Cc: "notmuch@notmuchmail.org" <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 15:40:08 -0000\r
+\r
+On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 5:02 AM, Tom Bulli <mrbulli@yahoo.com> wrote:\r
+> I have a project where I need to search about 21 emails - and decided to =\r
+use "notmuch" for it.=C2=A0 The system is a Debian Squeeze, the notmuch ver=\r
+sion is "0.8-1~bpo60+1" from "kyria's" private repository.\r
+>\r
+> I am running the "notmuch new" for approx. 4 days now - and according to =\r
+"not,uch count" it has indexed about 4.5 million emails.\r
+>\r
+> Is this expected performance?=C2=A0 Is there any way to speed that up?\r
+\r
+It would be nice to run something like this with OProfile (or perf)\r
+and see if there's some obvious fixes.\r
+\r
+--=20\r
+Felipe Contreras\r