make questions to Joey more explicit

diff --git a/doc/todo/allow_plugins_to_add_sorting_methods.mdwn b/doc/todo/allow_plugins_to_add_sorting_methods.mdwn
index 156678da7db9528e0ab4bca1d59af033d0d8f8ee..36c134a59c45cac71afc4db02fc2a2bc018f6bb3 100644 (file)
--- a/doc/todo/allow_plugins_to_add_sorting_methods.mdwn
+++ b/doc/todo/allow_plugins_to_add_sorting_methods.mdwn
@@ -36,9 +36,9 @@ That earlier version of the branch is also available for comparison:
 >>>>> introducing "sort spec" in the API. I took a cue from
 >>>>> [[ikiwiki/pagespec/sorting]] being a subpage of
 >>>>> [[ikiwiki/pagespec]], and decided that yes, sorting is
->>>>> a bit like a pagespec :-) --s
+>>>>> a bit like a pagespec :-) Which name would you prefer? --s
 
->>>> I would be inclined to drop the `check_` stuff.
+>>>> I would be inclined to drop the `check_` stuff. --J
 
 >>>>> It basically exists to support `title_natural`, to avoid
 >>>>> firing up the whole import mechanism on every `cmp`
@@ -50,10 +50,10 @@ That earlier version of the branch is also available for comparison:
 >>>>>
 >>>>> The former function could be achieved at a small
 >>>>> compatibility cost by putting `title_natural` in a new
->>>>> sortnatural plugin (that fails to load if you don't
+>>>>> `sortnatural` plugin (that fails to load if you don't
 >>>>> have `title_natural`), if you'd prefer - that's what would
 >>>>> have happened if `title_natural` was written after this
->>>>> code had been merged, I suspect. --s
+>>>>> code had been merged, I suspect. Would you prefer this? --s
 
 >>>> Wouldn't it make sense to have `meta(title)` instead
 >>>> of `meta_title`? --J
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ That earlier version of the branch is also available for comparison:
 >>>> "ascending age" both seem useful to be able to explicitly specify.
 >>>> --[[Joey]]
 
->>>>> Perhaps. I do like the simplicity of [[KathyrnAndersen]]'s syntax
+>>>>> Perhaps. I do like the simplicity of [[KathrynAndersen]]'s syntax
 >>>>> from [[plugins/contrib/report]] (which I copied verbatim, except for
 >>>>> turning sort-by-`field` into a parameterized spec), and I can't really
 >>>>> think of any sensible way to combine sort specs other than "sort by a,
@@ -130,7 +130,8 @@ That earlier version of the branch is also available for comparison:
 >>>>> voltage, with more or less recently updated pages being said to have
 >>>>> more or less updateage. I don't know whether that's good or bad :-)
 >>>>>
->>>>> I'm sure there's a much better word, but I can't see it. --s
+>>>>> I'm sure there's a much better word, but I can't see it. Do you have
+>>>>> a better idea? --s
 
 ## Documentation from sort-package branch