RE: [Spam-verdenking][english 100%] Re: another bug fix release: 0.15.2, in progress.

diff --git a/56/0349b3941dc11f6743da70f995522c582d234a b/56/0349b3941dc11f6743da70f995522c582d234a
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..b9e1299
--- /dev/null
+++ b/56/0349b3941dc11f6743da70f995522c582d234a
@@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
+Return-Path: <bremner@unb.ca>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDBEE431FD6\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 10:24:33 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]\r
+       autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id cLwMw-Gw9mse for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Mon, 11 Feb 2013 10:24:33 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from tesseract.cs.unb.ca (tesseract.cs.unb.ca [131.202.240.238])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B6E8431FC4\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 10:24:28 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from fctnnbsc30w-156034082078.dhcp-dynamic.fibreop.nb.bellaliant.net\r
+       ([156.34.82.78] helo=zancas.localnet)\r
+       by tesseract.cs.unb.ca with esmtpsa\r
+       (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80)\r
+       (envelope-from <bremner@unb.ca>)\r
+       id 1U4XDF-000448-KQ; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 09:45:04 -0400\r
+Received: from bremner by zancas.localnet with local (Exim 4.80)\r
+       (envelope-from <bremner@unb.ca>)\r
+       id 1U4XD9-0003B7-VB; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 09:44:51 -0400\r
+From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>\r
+To: Robert Mast <beheerder@tekenbeetziekten.nl>\r
+Subject: RE: [Spam-verdenking][english 100%] Re: another bug fix release:\r
+       0.15.2, in progress.\r
+In-Reply-To: <003b01ce0791$39239a50$ab6acef0$@nl>\r
+References: <1359501973-27671-1-git-send-email-david@tethera.net>\r
+       <87bobt9dcq.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+       <003b01ce0791$39239a50$ab6acef0$@nl>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.15.1 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.2.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 09:44:51 -0400\r
+Message-ID: <87y5ew8er0.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+X-Spam_bar: -\r
+Cc: Notmuch List <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 18:24:34 -0000\r
+\r
+Robert Mast <beheerder@tekenbeetziekten.nl> writes:\r
+\r
+> David/Austin,\r
+>\r
+> I sent it as a patch to my previous patch. Is that correct, or should I first 'revert' the file to 15.1?\r
+>\r
+> Robert\r
+\r
+Hi Robert;\r
+\r
+I didn't see any followup patch from you on the list; can you tell me the\r
+message-id?\r
+\r
+In any case, in general you should send complete patches or or patch series\r
+against git master, since we care both about the commit message, and what\r
+changes are part of each commit.  Most people use the git rebase command\r
+to update patches before re-sending them.\r
+\r
+d\r