Re: Getting the right root mail of the thread

diff --git a/54/d77d56052853978c587fdfdefb2f0db1702013 b/54/d77d56052853978c587fdfdefb2f0db1702013
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..d2f43ab
--- /dev/null
+++ b/54/d77d56052853978c587fdfdefb2f0db1702013
@@ -0,0 +1,90 @@
+Return-Path: <jani@nikula.org>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 085E5429E4E\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun,  3 Nov 2013 13:36:49 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.7\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id ZhQ8HMPfNr3P for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Sun,  3 Nov 2013 13:36:41 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from mail-ee0-f51.google.com (mail-ee0-f51.google.com\r
+ [74.125.83.51])       (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))        (No client\r
+ certificate requested)        by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id\r
+ 553EE429E4D   for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun,  3 Nov 2013 13:36:39 -0800\r
+ (PST)\r
+Received: by mail-ee0-f51.google.com with SMTP id t10so745622eei.10\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 03 Nov 2013 13:36:38 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;\r
+       d=1e100.net; s=20130820;\r
+       h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references\r
+       :user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type;\r
+       bh=EdylY+t76CvvfT/DeghEo2ovguyLmeT6kSqtZ634tc4=;\r
+       b=X7qc93QVqB6ExArJphuZL/drSzTqlMzhzEZKZYmekwkkW34B9rcbX5/3xt3hYe+n/N\r
+       4r4zX1bywkSWUbTS03S5C/DNmIq/UiUKVcv+TaLzzAlqVtPZ/qCHU49onojxgv+9xZ/X\r
+       aQZ/gJtQahv9ibZZdy5UixgSEHm5SjQybkXU1UAtntUBEbYkY9FxBzehq+L7fRxeEAPi\r
+       ZPMXfg1Hn6U2U3XLm71IPQ/lH9APr+QZujkTVdnXmxPQ58kZ96z6Ae2YNLx8csTgZqO7\r
+       6RgewxmWeO/v4QAbl5o4o66XT+UAVSFB2tzVsY9ApwpY9G9UnlVEE/f6eOaqrvpJR3Cx\r
+       a6gQ==\r
+X-Gm-Message-State:\r
+ ALoCoQll2wIbWQSaroVU9+LuDO8tbjqxs8Cn/YZJ0XU5390nZvtablJPBYBWoc3SYzV+uoF8nopr\r
+X-Received: by 10.14.48.14 with SMTP id u14mr1426044eeb.74.1383514133348;\r
+       Sun, 03 Nov 2013 13:28:53 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from localhost (dsl-hkibrasgw2-58c36f-91.dhcp.inet.fi.\r
+       [88.195.111.91])\r
+       by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id d7sm38023768eem.8.2013.11.03.13.28.51\r
+       for <multiple recipients>\r
+       (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);\r
+       Sun, 03 Nov 2013 13:28:52 -0800 (PST)\r
+From: Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>\r
+To: Jesse Rosenthal <jrosenthal@jhu.edu>,\r
+       Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: Getting the right root mail of the thread\r
+In-Reply-To: <87k3gprzo0.fsf@jhu.edu>\r
+References: <5274f93e254b5_6de7f51e7849@nysa.notmuch>\r
+       <87zjpmoqtz.fsf@nikula.org> <87k3gprzo0.fsf@jhu.edu>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.16+120~gfd733a4 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2013 23:28:51 +0200\r
+Message-ID: <87k3gpyy24.fsf@nikula.org>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2013 21:36:49 -0000\r
+\r
+On Sun, 03 Nov 2013, Jesse Rosenthal <jrosenthal@jhu.edu> wrote:\r
+> The current behavior can be annoying, but the old behavior could make\r
+> the MUA quite unusable in a number of circumstances. (And yes, an MUA\r
+> that fails on reading mail from senders with bad emailing practices is\r
+> unusable for me.)\r
+\r
+I wouldn't have suggested changing the current default behaviour anyway,\r
+but thanks for reminding us there are users depending on it!\r
+\r
+> Maybe there should be a "show original subject" toggle? That wouldn't be\r
+> too hard, though it would require another call to the library and\r
+> regenerating the search results.\r
+\r
+IMO the best approach would be including the first (or oldest, or\r
+original) subject in the structured thread summary output, in addition\r
+to the first matching subject that we have now.\r
+\r
+BR,\r
+Jani.\r