Re: Syntactic sugar for range syntax
authorRobert Künnemann <robert@kunnemann.de>
Sat, 13 Jun 2015 09:33:22 +0000 (11:33 +0200)
committerW. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
Sat, 20 Aug 2016 21:49:02 +0000 (14:49 -0700)
fc/72fa76d11391549df8b31b975132a0859835f4 [new file with mode: 0644]

diff --git a/fc/72fa76d11391549df8b31b975132a0859835f4 b/fc/72fa76d11391549df8b31b975132a0859835f4
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..3274df2
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
+Return-Path: <robert@kunnemann.de>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AA356DE0C42\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 13 Jun 2015 02:33:31 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0.004\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.004 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.004, \r
+ RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id 1LDc8YKLOdm9 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Sat, 13 Jun 2015 02:33:29 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from wp251.webpack.hosteurope.de (wp251.webpack.hosteurope.de\r
+ [80.237.133.20])\r
+ by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DEB866DE0948\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 13 Jun 2015 02:33:28 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from dslb-088-069-220-164.088.069.pools.vodafone-ip.de\r
+ ([88.69.220.164] helo=localhost); authenticated\r
+ by wp251.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa\r
+ (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)\r
+ id 1Z3hoY-0002C2-St; Sat, 13 Jun 2015 11:33:22 +0200\r
+Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2015 11:33:22 +0200\r
+From: Robert =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=FCnnemann?= <robert@kunnemann.de>\r
+To: Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>\r
+Subject: Re: Syntactic sugar for range syntax\r
+Message-ID: <20150613093322.GA28382@peachum>\r
+References: <20150610153833.GA19301@peachum.local> <87h9qejgyz.fsf@nikula.org>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed\r
+Content-Disposition: inline\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\r
+In-Reply-To: <87h9qejgyz.fsf@nikula.org>\r
+User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1 (2014-03-12)\r
+X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de;robert@kunnemann.de;1434188008;10e5c876;\r
+Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2015 09:33:31 -0000\r
+\r
+Hi!\r
+\r
+Thanks for your response!\r
+\r
+On 11/06, Jani Nikula wrote:\r
+>>  date:today-1week..today\r
+>In other words, date:1w..\r
+>The reference for relative dates is "now" if one is not specified.\r
+>The minus sign means nothing, relative dates all refer to the past\r
+>and are added together.\r
+That's good enough for my purposes. The man page could be a bit\r
+clearer on that, I'll try to send a patch later.\r
+\r
+With kind regards, Robert Künnemann\r