--- /dev/null
+Return-Path: <dme@dme.org>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CE0E6DE13FB\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 02:55:21 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.128\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.128 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+ tests=[AWL=-0.061, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,\r
+ RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01,\r
+ RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.652, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001]\r
+ autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id D56nIfbdoN3Y for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Wed, 17 Feb 2016 02:55:17 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from mail-wm0-f46.google.com (mail-wm0-f46.google.com\r
+ [74.125.82.46]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52F566DE0FC5 for\r
+ <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 02:55:17 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: by mail-wm0-f46.google.com with SMTP id a4so22055693wme.1\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 02:55:17 -0800 (PST)\r
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;\r
+ d=dme-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;\r
+ h=to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id\r
+ :mime-version:content-type;\r
+ bh=oxa3Uu2bym82pxNxohC8RTMGgCEDTuvu+hQ2ueex0fk=;\r
+ b=J5ab8DyetOeyNUne8hj4yWOx1RgHBVOK8kHVk3FwIsz8NHZQfkm6rOyE6VHoplGrOM\r
+ bZ8NWyOhordT0I6dYSlZ2b0nz8XmAevFMcMx6urgShwpnr2AOxPbRYBnIKv4Z4udCGVo\r
+ 5/tlNpSWgDCWj/Z+Km/KntFuC4eRVOAqnonHUjNyetE6j61jHMii1uXnBrzPvjTpbqFw\r
+ ltaF6I4bxqWwL3vk45Hm5liLecKSHZMwGPqRaKKlyRIQAVnlL4HgD2/uXdQ2Ri5+nwax\r
+ +h36ykNUtMz7LTSNE9Md6lBdkPa8q3BRsKYjSE5yRgN4H6bOMW99dT33NGoGrCh6MJAg\r
+ ORuQ==\r
+X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;\r
+ d=1e100.net; s=20130820;\r
+ h=x-gm-message-state:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:from:date\r
+ :message-id:mime-version:content-type;\r
+ bh=oxa3Uu2bym82pxNxohC8RTMGgCEDTuvu+hQ2ueex0fk=;\r
+ b=M/A9NI1Pq1aW+Jx+lvEOmzA7RCgY1n2+CtVSYt0h1Bl8NTpb2tPXz1S/Alri0C9Q+/\r
+ YILFXqb6WOK2clrfhirumZc2Fjx7oTN+OKPGiXxaEek/UIKMB1NU4LXkFoRv+iwbySzx\r
+ xq8fU2z+V7ZOvmkdeSVhsDnDzS36TfdvHZaMlGPTkBAioIYaD26AM+BN4kcn25GLSuGX\r
+ SKgOxdkninFlHaqvbtk0MLogIvJN+AYM/RXB9UuOfrisWXxypAF3qkCflOuIsZRxLc6F\r
+ +i1wt/8Lmd0AOOEsxY1riEdVYCxJk02sUo26graljOfwa71OtvdnWaVygEeGE97hBSyc\r
+ kluA==\r
+X-Gm-Message-State:\r
+ AG10YOQnXA2utyT8ettR18RdtgDPcQwMDU8MhF/qyqzotyoq4k1O9RPmQ9P7iQxp2XC32g==\r
+X-Received: by 10.28.147.72 with SMTP id v69mr23205923wmd.79.1455706515890;\r
+ Wed, 17 Feb 2016 02:55:15 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from disaster-area.hh.sledj.net\r
+ ([2a01:348:1a2:1:ea39:35ff:fe2c:a227])\r
+ by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id az10sm882712wjc.28.2016.02.17.02.55.14\r
+ (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);\r
+ Wed, 17 Feb 2016 02:55:14 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from localhost (disaster-area.hh.sledj.net [local])\r
+ by disaster-area.hh.sledj.net (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id 876d6d14;\r
+ Wed, 17 Feb 2016 10:55:13 +0000 (UTC)\r
+To: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>, "W. Trevor King" <wking@tremily.us>\r
+Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: nmbug in the Debian packages?\r
+In-Reply-To: <87h9h8vlrj.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+References: <cun37t5r91p.fsf@disaster-area.hh.sledj.net>\r
+ <87twlj8mix.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> <20160208193804.GE4265@odin.tremily.us>\r
+ <87lh6o79vb.fsf@zancas.localnet> <20160213220250.GB4265@odin.tremily.us>\r
+ <87h9h8vlrj.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+From: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>\r
+Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 10:55:13 +0000\r
+Message-ID: <m2bn7f1u9a.fsf@dme.org>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 10:55:21 -0000\r
+\r
+On Tue, Feb 16 2016, David Bremner wrote:\r
+> "W. Trevor King" <wking@tremily.us> writes:\r
+>\r
+>>\r
+>> I'd floated notmuch-dtag earlier [1]. Does that sound right? Or do\r
+>> folks prefer another name?\r
+>>\r
+>\r
+> I had a thought about this. The password manager "pass" uses\r
+>\r
+> pass git {push|pull}\r
+>\r
+> for git related operations. Perhaps that would make sense for us as\r
+> well?\r
+\r
+My initial reaction is that there might be many other potential\r
+interpretations of what "notmuch-git" functionality should look like (as\r
+distinct from current nmbug functionality).\r
+\r
+As you mention below, there's quite a lot of implementation in nmbug\r
+that is not simply "put some stuff in a git repository".\r
+\r
+> So initially "notmuch-git". I'm of course open to better ideas, but\r
+> especially since you pushed a bit to make the interface follow git\r
+> more closely, perhaps that's a more informative name than "dtag". It\r
+> also leaves open the possibility of stashing other metadata than tags,\r
+> should something like [1] come to pass.\r
+>\r
+> On the other hand, it's true that what we're doing is less transparent\r
+> than what pass does, which is really just pass the arguments straight\r
+> through to git.\r
+>\r
+> [1] id:1453561198-2893-2-git-send-email-david@tethera.net\r
+> _______________________________________________\r
+> notmuch mailing list\r
+> notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+> https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch\r
projects / notmuch-archives.git / commitdiff