calibcant/discussion.tex: Fix 'florian95' -> 'florin95' typo

diff --git a/src/calibcant/discussion.tex b/src/calibcant/discussion.tex
index 700a1831fbd3deff7e5878e46d6ab780eb61ed37..721edbd18fee6a8e24e16777f5048641b5792270 100644 (file)
--- a/src/calibcant/discussion.tex
+++ b/src/calibcant/discussion.tex
@@ -17,8 +17,8 @@ where $x_0$ sets the center and $\Gamma$ sets the width of the curve.
 It is unclear whether the references are due to uncertainty about the
 definition of the Lorentzian or to the fact that \cref{eq:model-psd}
 is also peaked and therefore \cref{eq:lorentzian} a potential
-substitute for \cref{eq:model-psd}.  \citet{florian95}
-likely \cref{are} using \cref{eq:lorentzian}, as the slope of the
+substitute for \cref{eq:model-psd}.  \citet{florin95}
+likely \emph{are} using \cref{eq:lorentzian}, as the slope of the
 fitted \PSD\ in their figure 2, has a slope at $f=0$.
 Using \cref{eq:model-psd}, the derivative would have been zero, as we
 can see by using the chain rule repeatedly,