Re: [PATCH 2/5] test: Fix date in test message in multipart test.
authorDavid Bremner <david@tethera.net>
Mon, 5 Sep 2011 12:06:57 +0000 (09:06 +2100)
committerW. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
Fri, 7 Nov 2014 17:39:21 +0000 (09:39 -0800)
c6/29cc12481fbc400d6caee33ad76ffd06b890a0 [new file with mode: 0644]

diff --git a/c6/29cc12481fbc400d6caee33ad76ffd06b890a0 b/c6/29cc12481fbc400d6caee33ad76ffd06b890a0
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..652793e
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
+Return-Path: <bremner@unb.ca>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DE27431FD0\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon,  5 Sep 2011 05:07:14 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -2.3\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id ksYeIXIpY-xA for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Mon,  5 Sep 2011 05:07:10 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from tempo.its.unb.ca (tempo.its.unb.ca [131.202.1.21])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C71B431FB6\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon,  5 Sep 2011 05:07:10 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from zancas.localnet\r
+       (fctnnbsc36w-156034073093.pppoe-dynamic.High-Speed.nb.bellaliant.net\r
+       [156.34.73.93]) (authenticated bits=0)\r
+       by tempo.its.unb.ca (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p85C6wDQ025502\r
+       (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);\r
+       Mon, 5 Sep 2011 09:06:59 -0300\r
+Received: from bremner by zancas.localnet with local (Exim 4.76)\r
+       (envelope-from <bremner@unb.ca>)\r
+       id 1R0Xx4-0007K5-0l; Mon, 05 Sep 2011 09:06:58 -0300\r
+From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>\r
+To: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>,\r
+       Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] test: Fix date in test message in multipart test.\r
+In-Reply-To: <1307320169-29905-3-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+References: <87sjrsi2b4.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net>\r
+       <1307320169-29905-1-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+       <1307320169-29905-2-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+       <1307320169-29905-3-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.7 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 09:06:57 -0300\r
+Message-ID: <8739gbura6.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 12:07:14 -0000\r
+\r
+On Sun,  5 Jun 2011 17:29:26 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net> wrote:\r
+> The test message date, "Tue, 05 Jan 2001 15:43:57 -0000", is not\r
+> actually a real date.  05 Jan 2001 was in fact a Friday, not a\r
+> Tuesday.  Date parsers (such as "date" in coreutils) will return "Fri"\r
+> as the day for this string, even if "Tue" is specified.\r
+> \r
+\r
+I pushed parts 1 and 2 of this series. As discussed on IRC, part 3 has\r
+conflicts currently, but I think the first two patches stand by\r
+themselves anyway.\r
+\r
+d\r