Re: [PATCH 1/2] emacs: If archiving the last message in a thread, show the next thread.

diff --git a/9c/dcfc397d733d317b5c703c7323e3783b8c0e70 b/9c/dcfc397d733d317b5c703c7323e3783b8c0e70
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..fdc7213
--- /dev/null
+++ b/9c/dcfc397d733d317b5c703c7323e3783b8c0e70
@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
+Return-Path: <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12E6A429E5B\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 01:25:36 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]\r
+       autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id BzF23vBzOBRw for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Tue, 31 Jan 2012 01:25:35 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (guru-group.fi [87.108.86.66])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 703DD429E34\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 01:25:35 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: by guru.guru-group.fi (Postfix, from userid 501)\r
+       id 2AFDF68056; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 11:25:36 +0200 (EET)\r
+From: Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>\r
+To: Dmitry Kurochkin <dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com>,\r
+       David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] emacs: If archiving the last message in a thread,\r
+       show the next thread.\r
+In-Reply-To: <871uqgntjz.fsf@gmail.com>\r
+References: <1327996914-9644-1-git-send-email-dme@dme.org>\r
+       <1327996914-9644-2-git-send-email-dme@dme.org>\r
+       <m2r4yg2rfl.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi> <871uqgntjz.fsf@gmail.com>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11+146~geb6dc33 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1\r
+       (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)\r
+X-Face: HhBM'cA~<r"^Xv\KRN0P{vn'Y"Kd;zg_y3S[4)KSN~s?O\"QPoL\r
+       $[Xv_BD:i/F$WiEWax}R(MPS`^UaptOGD`*/=@\1lKoVa9tnrg0TW?"r7aRtgk[F\r
+       !)g;OY^,BjTbr)Np:%c_o'jj,Z\r
+Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 11:25:36 +0200\r
+Message-ID: <m2mx942pgv.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 09:25:36 -0000\r
+\r
+On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 12:51:44 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin <dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com> wrote:\r
+> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:43:10 +0200, Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi> wrote:\r
+> > On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 08:01:53 +0000, David Edmondson <dme@dme.org> wrote:\r
+> > > When archiving the last message in a thread (a), rather than just\r
+> > > moving the pointer to the next thread in the parent search buffer,\r
+> > > actually display the next thread.\r
+> > > ---\r
+> > \r
+> > -1. Magic! Rather some customization option which lets user choose\r
+> > consistent behaviour (i.e. 'a' either jumps to search buffer or\r
+> > goes to next thread always (default?)).\r
+> > \r
+> \r
+> FWIW this behavior is consistent with how archiving worked before\r
+> earlier today.  For those who uses archiving, the new behavior is a\r
+> surprise.  So I would argue that this patch makes it less "magic".  And\r
+> consistent with the current "A" behavior.\r
+\r
+Yes, I had a thinko there. 'a' progresses to next message after archiving\r
+and not back to search buffer...\r
+\r
+I like David's alternative suggestion (in IRC) where cursor is left at\r
+the end of buffer in case last message is archived with 'a'.\r
+\r
+> Regards,\r
+>   Dmitry\r
+\r
+Thanks, \r
+\r
+Tomi\r
+\r