--- /dev/null
+Return-Path: <david@tethera.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 394DC431FBD\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 20 May 2013 07:32:49 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -2.3\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+ tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id 9EzY-mjuU3qi for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Mon, 20 May 2013 07:32:44 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from tempo.its.unb.ca (tempo.its.unb.ca [131.202.1.21])\r
+ (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+ (No client certificate requested)\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5B3E431FB6\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 20 May 2013 07:32:43 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from tesseract.cs.unb.ca (tesseract.cs.unb.ca [131.202.240.238])\r
+ by tempo.its.unb.ca (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r4KEWdZ5002916;\r
+ Mon, 20 May 2013 11:32:39 -0300\r
+Received: from fctnnbsc30w-156034082078.dhcp-dynamic.fibreop.nb.bellaliant.net\r
+ ([156.34.82.78] helo=zancas.localnet)\r
+ by tesseract.cs.unb.ca with esmtpsa\r
+ (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80)\r
+ (envelope-from <david@tethera.net>)\r
+ id 1UeR8g-0006y6-RF; Mon, 20 May 2013 11:32:39 -0300\r
+Received: from bremner by zancas.localnet with local (Exim 4.80)\r
+ (envelope-from <david@tethera.net>)\r
+ id 1UeR8b-00061R-4T; Mon, 20 May 2013 11:32:33 -0300\r
+From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>\r
+To: Patrick Gerken <notmuch@patrick-gerken.de>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: Python Bindings missing on PyPI\r
+In-Reply-To: <20130520141459.30749.80963@mini>\r
+References: <20130520141459.30749.80963@mini>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.15.2+84~g12d5e4e (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1\r
+ (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 11:32:32 -0300\r
+Message-ID: <87zjvp90xr.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+X-Spam_bar: -\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 14:32:49 -0000\r
+\r
+Patrick Gerken <notmuch@patrick-gerken.de> writes:\r
+>\r
+> Is there any rationale that prevents registering the python bindings\r
+> on pypi?\r
+> If this is only because of missing maintainer, would anybody\r
+> object if I put the bindings on pypi?\r
+\r
+I imagine the python bindings are pretty dependent on the version of\r
+notmuch they ship with; I'm not sure how well shipping them\r
+independently will work out.\r
+\r
+That said, whatever you and Justus (who maintains the python bindings in\r
+notmuch) agree on is probably fine with the rest of us.\r
+\r
+d\r
+\r