Re: New "notmuch address" command
authorLele Gaifax <lele@metapensiero.it>
Sun, 14 Dec 2014 18:56:34 +0000 (19:56 +0100)
committerW. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
Sat, 20 Aug 2016 21:47:00 +0000 (14:47 -0700)
3c/9b980b8d272ea37122f3202ca3a8ca122c94a3 [new file with mode: 0644]

diff --git a/3c/9b980b8d272ea37122f3202ca3a8ca122c94a3 b/3c/9b980b8d272ea37122f3202ca3a8ca122c94a3
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..e478663
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
+Return-Path: <gmn-notmuch@m.gmane.org>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32685431FB6\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 10:56:54 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0.165\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.165 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO=0.865]\r
+       autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id j8SORxGFRZ5I for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Sun, 14 Dec 2014 10:56:48 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DC08431FAF\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 10:56:48 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)\r
+       (envelope-from <gmn-notmuch@m.gmane.org>) id 1Y0ELW-0008JU-6Z\r
+       for notmuch@notmuchmail.org; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 19:56:46 +0100\r
+Received: from 151.62.88.167 ([151.62.88.167])\r
+       by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))\r
+       id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 19:56:46 +0100\r
+Received: from lele by 151.62.88.167 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))\r
+       id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 19:56:46 +0100\r
+X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/\r
+To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+From: Lele Gaifax <lele@metapensiero.it>\r
+Subject: Re: New "notmuch address" command\r
+Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2014 19:56:34 +0100\r
+Organization: Nautilus Entertainments\r
+Lines: 21\r
+Message-ID: <87fvcioyal.fsf@nautilus.nautilus>\r
+References: <878uid9qjl.fsf@nautilus.nautilus>\r
+       <87ppbpf8yy.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz> <874mt19iho.fsf@nautilus.nautilus>\r
+       <87388inway.fsf@resox.2x.cz>\r
+Mime-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\r
+X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org\r
+X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 151.62.88.167\r
+User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux)\r
+Cancel-Lock: sha1:+dIl2V4dgDq+VfvFuo0q0YqoPbY=\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2014 18:56:54 -0000\r
+\r
+Michal Sojka <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz> writes:\r
+\r
+> On Pá, pro 12 2014, Lele Gaifax wrote:\r
+>> It's not just a matter of filtering, but rather *which* address is\r
+>> emitted: trying it out, in the case above the "foo@bar.com" is not even\r
+>> mentioned in the output, because it appears only as a CCed recipient.\r
+>\r
+> Are you saying that Cc address is not printed or that you want it not to\r
+> be printed? If the former than it is a bug. The following test passes\r
+> for me, i.e. foo@bar.com is printed.\r
+\r
+Ouch, you are right, I stand corrected: I completely missed the\r
+--output=recipients option, and I see that by default it prints only the\r
+sender.\r
+\r
+Sorry for the noise,\r
+thank you and bye, lele.\r
+-- \r
+nickname: Lele Gaifax | Quando vivrò di quello che ho pensato ieri\r
+real: Emanuele Gaifas | comincerò ad aver paura di chi mi copia.\r
+lele@metapensiero.it  |                 -- Fortunato Depero, 1929.\r
+\r