Re: Patches for 0.12

diff --git a/cb/ed1ebba1fd9923c448075ae903144c235a942c b/cb/ed1ebba1fd9923c448075ae903144c235a942c
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..3528767
--- /dev/null
+++ b/cb/ed1ebba1fd9923c448075ae903144c235a942c
@@ -0,0 +1,103 @@
+Return-Path: <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F2BB431FAF\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 15:40:19 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -2.29\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id sbAF7Jg8lJG2 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Wed, 14 Mar 2012 15:40:19 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu\r
+       [131.215.239.19])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E98E0431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 15:40:18 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from fire-doxen.imss.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by fire-doxen-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D7EB2E50B4B;\r
+       Wed, 14 Mar 2012 15:40:18 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-IMSS on fire-doxen by amavisd-new\r
+Received: from finestructure.net (gwave-174.ligo.caltech.edu\r
+ [131.215.114.174])    (Authenticated sender: jrollins)        by fire-doxen-submit\r
+ (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B0872E50B93; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 15:40:14 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by finestructure.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)\r
+       id 72E8087A; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 15:40:14 -0700 (PDT)\r
+From: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+To: Austin Clements <amdragon@MIT.EDU>, David Bremner <david@tethera.net>\r
+Subject: Re: Patches for 0.12\r
+In-Reply-To: <20120314221601.GN2787@mit.edu>\r
+References: <87k42stuno.fsf@zancas.localnet> <20120314221601.GN2787@mit.edu>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11.1+306~g05d342c (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 15:40:11 -0700\r
+Message-ID: <87fwdahkms.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
+       micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
+Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 22:40:19 -0000\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
+\r
+On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 18:16:01 -0400, Austin Clements <amdragon@MIT.EDU> wrot=\r
+e:\r
+> > We had a somewhat lively debate about desirablity of the following\r
+> > patch. My decision is that for now, we avoid changing the behaviour of\r
+> > notmuch, and do apply the patch. We can discuss later deprecating or\r
+> > changing this permissive behaviour.=20\r
+> >=20\r
+> >    id:"1331385931-1610-1-git-send-email-david@tethera.net"\r
+>=20\r
+> Alternatively, can we just require GMime 2.6.7 by applying\r
+>   id:"1331515786-485-1-git-send-email-david@tethera.net"\r
+> instead of\r
+>   id:"1331385931-1610-1-git-send-email-david@tethera.net"\r
+> and\r
+>   id:"1329852935-3019-1-git-send-email-schnouki@schnouki.net"\r
+> ?\r
+\r
+I much prefer this solution (i.e. just require GMime 2.6.7 and no\r
+notmuch patches).  I still think we need some sort of coherent approach\r
+for rejecting mbox, but I think it will require a lot more thought.\r
+\r
+jamie.\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)\r
+\r
+iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJPYR5LAAoJEO00zqvie6q8FTwP/1zJkx/WmSosq0GsGuSupFeT\r
+DRshgwV23BxF+iIfQrPISGoLcm6/HbfxsBtvuF5CfNa48O52wCVfexKCSfb8nDVQ\r
++zOFYGIKkXI4oyGrlcuDY/jmW3e8K+wMMLsYIPYGXNe7UmeoLIUYCSt0dcd9r8SH\r
+rDekxT9kGROpHNZqu8vpYM21HzLUHJKlyvIKUMJJbo/QicdbapAqVT0eBMY43pTu\r
+lAPJiDL7XDt8w6eM/2UhgLJXz5rAobEQzpzmj4+YE7yoqz3CLt5P0yPkfMCo0TXG\r
+wY8fo0L+jM5Xsaey9niHYz1TNw++b/jM78IDz+3jXDRrJC3ECB8PWZyxPx23z6FL\r
+lotT1tsj6UrB6GrX00qhPCzgA7tPl8B2z3H6j5w0Q3k44lfRIZtwlP0LYimyHB6l\r
+G81wFVsJ5CSXD6PxawWC71EQP0hpwVax41uNJV6MgyuHwugKx0X7L55EGmmRV3IQ\r
+H5JcSVaE7aXyQ78fmn5ADXr5W2MuGdmU3InqudjATjDaN0umVMGqsW/khEoG2GBl\r
+pch2o+jeMRyTFWjCGI2c4FrE7t0eS522FW7jAWCvCv8LinLrFzm0eqBUINeffxqN\r
+TfNWMpZHG76XMTgCxQkfb/iDUqllJaIaFFPb/vrsK+XusYriu7aRjAEPb+8mh2ER\r
+W2cZaC3j/T99EUvODjhW\r
+=TUNA\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+--=-=-=--\r