Re: privacy problem: text/html parts pull in network resources

diff --git a/db/6f08af960b659ef9e2ab6e65428470321fd1ca b/db/6f08af960b659ef9e2ab6e65428470321fd1ca
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..6b19694
--- /dev/null
+++ b/db/6f08af960b659ef9e2ab6e65428470321fd1ca
@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
+Return-Path: <jinwoo68@gmail.com>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22992431FCB\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 10:14:34 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 2.639\r
+X-Spam-Level: **\r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.639 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,\r
+       DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL=2.438, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=1,\r
+       FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id U-wwF6V+vKuL for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Thu, 29 Jan 2015 10:14:31 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from mail-pa0-f53.google.com (mail-pa0-f53.google.com\r
+       [209.85.220.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9A17431FBC\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 10:14:30 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: by mail-pa0-f53.google.com with SMTP id kx10so41975403pab.12\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 10:14:29 -0800 (PST)\r
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;\r
+       h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id\r
+       :mime-version:content-type;\r
+       bh=Shk5IEFVaWoI92e39P87CwLNRTC3/laoke8/QTa6YsY=;\r
+       b=b1JPJ2JNu3xgP3WFEtzsnOklVxHCr0AUV0GbyAi6Zt/CRzHBG53NlACEHP2JowFCRV\r
+       7hoNyvWgzdrAmwINS+CO6WAgXa487gjkXLSfE7EI8oAONwfUdESj/y1XEKGlEgSsSagg\r
+       ouQ4CDGRBfjOeHQJMoUwCXod5DJMyJdmg9UwBtPX2z2Q1ccOHgqdAW0TMDM6ck6MQ4uZ\r
+       Ec2Ng2eCUrrjDEUQU+LjTC0naacaywsh+k1C9LM2NAhuPZingJ035qRu5TuMrJTW0+0d\r
+       Gi/k+ya7WyIUbjoQUIFupHD5RE+UUAdjxVr9ZNECrU0yWynUw+LwE+1PKnazoSjTzTNb\r
+       Gr3w==\r
+X-Received: by 10.66.157.5 with SMTP id wi5mr2571642pab.37.1422555269869;\r
+       Thu, 29 Jan 2015 10:14:29 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from localhost ([2601:9:5d00:15b9:9997:a9cd:4a6a:40f0])\r
+       by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id fg6sm8450866pdb.24.2015.01.29.10.14.28\r
+       (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);\r
+       Thu, 29 Jan 2015 10:14:29 -0800 (PST)\r
+From: Jinwoo Lee <jinwoo68@gmail.com>\r
+To: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>,\r
+       notmuch mailing list <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+Subject: Re: privacy problem: text/html parts pull in network resources\r
+In-Reply-To: <87wq45cvls.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net>\r
+References: <87ppa7q25w.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net>\r
+       <87fvay3g0g.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>\r
+       <871tmfin1k.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net>\r
+       <yq65h9vbtsyt.fsf@jinwoo-macbookair.roam.corp.google.com>\r
+       <yq65386uqx0a.fsf@jinwoo-macbookair.roam.corp.google.com>\r
+       <87wq45cvls.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.18.1 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.4.1\r
+       (x86_64-apple-darwin13.2.0)\r
+Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 10:14:27 -0800\r
+Message-ID: <yq65wq45sbcs.fsf@jinwoo-macbookair.roam.corp.google.com>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 18:14:34 -0000\r
+\r
+On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 10:03 AM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net> wrote:\r
+> On Wed 2015-01-28 18:57:25 -0500, Jinwoo Lee wrote:\r
+>> Do you mind if I add a boolean defcustom, which determines whether to\r
+>> block remote images?  Its default value will be T (block), but people\r
+>> who want to see remote images can customize it.\r
+>\r
+> I have no objection to this kind of knob in an already fiddly config\r
+> space.  In the other thread, i see the discussion of whether this should\r
+> expose something fancier than a boolean, but given the number of\r
+> possible rendering backends, i don't know how well we can support any of\r
+> these options reliably.\r
+>\r
+> What should notmuch do when the customization variable is set to t\r
+> (block remote images) but the html rendering backend doesn't support\r
+> blocking remote images?\r
+>\r
+> It seems dangerous/disingenuous to offer the option to the user but not\r
+> be able to enforce it in this case.  Should having this set to t\r
+> restrict the range of html renderers to only those that we can force to\r
+> respect it?\r
+\r
+I'm not very knowledgeable in the notmuch codebase, but I think I agree\r
+with your concern about this customization variable being dangerous or\r
+misleading users.\r
+\r
++1 to restricting renderers.\r
+\r
+>\r
+>         --dkg\r
+> _______________________________________________\r
+> notmuch mailing list\r
+> notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+> http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch\r