Failing instead of silently not updating remote refs makes the things
clearer for the user when trying to push on a repository while another
person do (or while a dandling locks are waiting for a 10 minutes
timeout).
When silently not updating remote refs, the user does not even know
that git has pushed the objects but leaved the refs as they were
before (e.g. a new bunch of commits on branch "master" is uploaded,
however the branch by itsel still points on the previous head commit).
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
info_ref_lock = lock_remote("info/refs", LOCK_TIME);
if (info_ref_lock)
remote->can_update_info_refs = 1;
+ else {
+ fprintf(stderr, "Error: cannot lock existing info/refs\n");
+ rc = 1;
+ goto cleanup;
+ }
}
if (remote->has_info_packs)
fetch_indices();