Re: the future of notmuch-vim?

diff --git a/14/7df09bb7c89fa7cab39254c5a40122085f4feb b/14/7df09bb7c89fa7cab39254c5a40122085f4feb
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..b7551a1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/14/7df09bb7c89fa7cab39254c5a40122085f4feb
@@ -0,0 +1,115 @@
+Return-Path: <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63443431FAF\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed,  3 Apr 2013 02:15:34 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.799\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,\r
+       FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id q+KriN1krPrY for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Wed,  3 Apr 2013 02:15:33 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from mail-ie0-f176.google.com (mail-ie0-f176.google.com\r
+       [209.85.223.176]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF911431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed,  3 Apr 2013 02:15:33 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by mail-ie0-f176.google.com with SMTP id x14so1416953ief.35\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 02:15:32 -0700 (PDT)\r
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;\r
+       h=x-received:date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to:references\r
+       :subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;\r
+       bh=d9MpGSTz3on4WzPEZJHeekNSBHz1eU4OrwTG2HqclBo=;\r
+       b=gkJcU7zKMp3Vv/MXWLqElsZMKJWbydid8dvrA+fLGPDQLGSlgNzHKBViqBDqgnz+f5\r
+       ipUyCnwjpRihhzqJEZnehdtXuCXyZEOo+xijc9fh7GP39WaS4bi3NtUf/NOF19wHUIiL\r
+       Xx5fo33W3alqK4rZureGulIHK5EfwidIjzeTZsie7z0habIxCETwsMk8Lv9yKccoEHRD\r
+       t4wtspK/d87MVpbJgpe/EmOZDRdj4mCzX1lM5KiYJ1OSO463sqiGMiiUpT6npjOrQ5Pp\r
+       oqQelP4tw7ezGzQ/LjfWBAlIh2vOiWh+u+rBo5c+l9pi4WQ6ltNkjgF3WmpscKg0wYS5\r
+       diUQ==\r
+X-Received: by 10.42.247.8 with SMTP id ma8mr493395icb.1.1364980532298;\r
+       Wed, 03 Apr 2013 02:15:32 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from localhost (187-163-100-70.static.axtel.net. [187.163.100.70])\r
+       by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id dy5sm3585214igc.1.2013.04.03.02.15.30\r
+       (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);\r
+       Wed, 03 Apr 2013 02:15:31 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 03:09:39 -0600\r
+From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>\r
+To: guyzmo <guyzmo+notmuch@m0g.net>, \r
+       Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>\r
+Message-ID: <515bf1d3cdb5b_79f845e181791@nysa.mail>\r
+In-Reply-To: <20130403060158.GJ7702@vilya.m0g.net>\r
+References: <871udhcmks.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+       <515b37a1821fc_146e1045e1094149@nysa.mail>\r
+       <20130403060158.GJ7702@vilya.m0g.net>\r
+Subject: Re: the future of notmuch-vim?\r
+Mime-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain;\r
+ charset=utf-8\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit\r
+Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 09:15:34 -0000\r
+\r
+guyzmo wrote:\r
+\r
+> On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 01:55:13PM -0600, Felipe Contreras wrote:\r
+> > Sorry for the late reply, I wasn't following the ml.\r
+> \r
+> same here\r
+> \r
+> > David Bremner wrote:\r
+> > > - There are now several alternatives for people whose only motivation to\r
+> > >   use the vim frontend was dislike of emacs (alot and notmuch-mutt).\r
+> > I did try the emacs frontend, and it was not working properly for me at the\r
+> > time, and I believe I documented my issues. It was not just my dislike of emacs\r
+> > that motivated me to write notmuch-vim-ruby.\r
+> \r
+>     I'd say not liking emacs is not a good reason  for  using  vim  as a\r
+> MUA. Vim is just a text editor, and nothing else.\r
+\r
+Vim is a pretty extensible text editor that works prectly fine as a MUA, in\r
+fact, much better than any other MUA I've ever used. That is a good reason.\r
+\r
+> > > There are several alternative vim frontends floating around in (at\r
+> > > least) ruby and python. I don't if they are better or worse\r
+> > > functionality wise. \r
+> > I'd say notmuch-vim-ruby is the best one, but of course I'm biased :)\r
+> \r
+>     It may be nice and/or fun to use that kind  of  things  in  vim, but\r
+> really, it's opposite to the philosophy of vim.\r
+\r
+The philosophy of vim is irrelevant, what is relevant is what you can do with\r
+it, and you can use it as a perfectly good MUA.\r
+\r
+> I  personnally  prefer a thousand times to use mutt-kz, alot as MUA,  and\r
+> vim  only  for writing mails.\r
+\r
+What you prefer is irrelevant; it's relevant only for you, that's why it's\r
+called a *preference*, the rest of us prefer different things.\r
+\r
+I've tried mutt-kz and alot, and I was utterly dissapointed by both.\r
+\r
+See how snappy and fast notmuch-vim-ruby is[1], alot is much worst in these\r
+respects.\r
+\r
+[1] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JGD7IbZmnIs\r
+\r
+-- \r
+Felipe Contreras\r