Re: excessive thread fusing

diff --git a/5a/e4503b44e4e98f9b75c30386a1a92f84153e93 b/5a/e4503b44e4e98f9b75c30386a1a92f84153e93
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..82be5ab
--- /dev/null
+++ b/5a/e4503b44e4e98f9b75c30386a1a92f84153e93
@@ -0,0 +1,90 @@
+Return-Path: <eric@deptj.eu>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F9E4431FBD\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 19 Apr 2014 10:52:14 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]\r
+       autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id KJEAJKWDaqSp for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Sat, 19 Apr 2014 10:52:09 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from earth.solardns.com (earth.solardns.com [94.76.229.85])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93BDB431FB6\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 19 Apr 2014 10:52:09 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from cpc1-finc12-2-0-cust846.4-2.cable.virginm.net\r
+       ([82.18.251.79]:33040 helo=teckel.deptj.eu)\r
+       by earth.solardns.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256)\r
+       (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <eric@deptj.eu>)\r
+       id 1WbZQo-0000Bo-VO; Sat, 19 Apr 2014 18:52:03 +0100\r
+Received: from eric by teckel.deptj.eu with local (Exim 4.80.1)\r
+       (envelope-from <eric@deptj.eu>)\r
+       id 1WbZQo-00028u-60; Sat, 19 Apr 2014 18:52:02 +0100\r
+From: Eric <eric@deptj.eu>\r
+Subject: Re: excessive thread fusing\r
+To: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>, notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+In-Reply-To: <87ioq5mrbz.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>\r
+References: <87ioq5mrbz.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>\r
+Message-Id: <E1WbZQo-00028u-60@teckel.deptj.eu>\r
+Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2014 18:52:02 +0100\r
+X--MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information\r
+X--MailScanner-ID: 1WbZQo-0000Bo-VO\r
+X--MailScanner: Not scanned: please contact your Internet E-Mail Service\r
+       Provider for details\r
+X--MailScanner-SpamCheck: \r
+X--MailScanner-From: eric@deptj.eu\r
+X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse,\r
+       please include it with any abuse report\r
+X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - earth.solardns.com\r
+X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - notmuchmail.org\r
+X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]\r
+X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - deptj.eu\r
+X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: earth.solardns.com: authenticated_id: deptjeu/from_h\r
+X-Source: \r
+X-Source-Args: \r
+X-Source-Dir: \r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2014 17:52:14 -0000\r
+\r
+On Sat, 19 Apr 2014 21:33:36 +0900, David Bremner <david@tethera.net> wrote:\r
+> \r
+> Gregor Zattler mentioned some problems with threading at \r
+> \r
+>        id:20120126004024.GA13704@shi.workgroup\r
+> \r
+> After some off list discussions, I believe I have a smaller test case.\r
+> \r
+> The attached maildir contains 24 messages from the org mode list.\r
+> \r
+> According to notmuch, these form one thread, but I can't figure out\r
+> exactly why. It seems like the chronologically first two messages should\r
+> be a seperate thread. There are several of the infamous malformed ME-E\r
+> In-reply-to headers, but each of these messages also has a References\r
+> header; this seems to indicate a case missed by commit cf8aaafbad68.\r
+> \r
+\r
+This may not actually be any help, but both hypermail and mhonarc agree\r
+that two messages form a separate thread from the rest. I believe that\r
+the latter, at least, is the JWZ algorithm.\r
+\r
+Eric\r
+-- \r
+ms fnd in a lbry\r