Re: github

diff --git a/95/8640578d3d92c856777b94043df56667e0bf8c b/95/8640578d3d92c856777b94043df56667e0bf8c
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..ad0f27b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/95/8640578d3d92c856777b94043df56667e0bf8c
@@ -0,0 +1,92 @@
+Return-Path: <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D109431FBD\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 12 May 2014 20:14:08 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.799\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,\r
+       FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id 1p5WexbjTHEd for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Mon, 12 May 2014 20:13:58 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from mail-qa0-f46.google.com (mail-qa0-f46.google.com\r
+       [209.85.216.46]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC7C9431FAF\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 12 May 2014 20:13:58 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by mail-qa0-f46.google.com with SMTP id w8so7873103qac.19\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 12 May 2014 20:13:57 -0700 (PDT)\r
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;\r
+       h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to\r
+       :cc:content-type;\r
+       bh=1gnrCv9mZvsf0ZjK1zLAnIU5P+guJerclnu8n7fCs6g=;\r
+       b=l+eR9sJPm2SkmL1yRKm3u6aevP7HqS7977ZaiNJ7OUg/lofJcUTAvu4Gfdrk6BY3iB\r
+       QQhsD0p8ZAv3wAMurXqLkBmLfe+5gf8GCWG4LyKLz/lgVeRiSXh+tt5wr7GjeXzaWU33\r
+       qfShj57vqNogYNLWvKGD2iUWONc8YyTjUSDz6qKqiJzfSBTJ5vCUqtSdGiHu8/PU3D/N\r
+       z7GFVCf8+nFvt97dWlJzNzKd2jnM/nrI2cSezZUS9CdEHYhwzimapqPrcctdLzBlmcvX\r
+       MVBCDKhQw1KFfOUS98UdIJApMKYAQN+1gLag45wIFFJZut0ftjjMMW351OWFDeR/epE2\r
+       q21Q==\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+X-Received: by 10.224.55.83 with SMTP id t19mr41331571qag.42.1399950837169;\r
+       Mon, 12 May 2014 20:13:57 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by 10.140.19.242 with HTTP; Mon, 12 May 2014 20:13:57 -0700 (PDT)\r
+In-Reply-To: <87mwemv29t.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+References: <87wqea7c37.fsf@nikula.org>\r
+       <87mwemv29t.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 22:13:57 -0500\r
+Message-ID:\r
+ <CAMP44s15N7mQNhVQN9GOCowXSbcLUYvW8JrtOtuAhYKsMsnG5g@mail.gmail.com>\r
+Subject: Re: github\r
+From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>\r
+To: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\r
+Cc: "notmuch@notmuchmail.org" <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 03:14:08 -0000\r
+\r
+On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 9:30 PM, Jameson Graef Rollins\r
+<jrollins@finestructure.net> wrote:\r
+> On Sun, Apr 27 2014, Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org> wrote:\r
+>> To be honest, I am slightly concerned by the popularity of\r
+>> github. Despite being a hosting site primarily for open source, it *is*\r
+>> a proprietary platform. Source code hosting is plain git, but AFAIK all\r
+>> the rest (review process, issue tracking, and so on) is pretty much at\r
+>> the whim and mercy of the company running it. They make a change, you\r
+>> adapt. If you don't want to adapt, it's not easy to switch over to\r
+>> another service provider either if you've built your process around\r
+>> github.\r
+>>\r
+>> So even if the features of github amazed me (they don't), I would have\r
+>> pretty strong reservations about relying on them.\r
+>\r
+> There seems to have been a lot of discussion on the list recently about\r
+> github.  I just want to express my very strong agreement with Jani's\r
+> sentiment above.  A lot of us in the notmuch community moved to notmuch\r
+> because we didn't want our email controlled by a single service provider\r
+> (e.g. gmail).  I don't want our development cycle controlled by github\r
+> (or any other proprietary SCM) for many of the same reasons.\r
+\r
+How would our development cycle be controlled by GitHub?\r
+\r
+The whole point of a distributed VCS is that there isn't a single\r
+central repository you rely on.\r
+\r
+-- \r
+Felipe Contreras\r