S/MIME patches, v4

diff --git a/40/46146b676f1c7dc75534c42b3fd1df03753588 b/40/46146b676f1c7dc75534c42b3fd1df03753588
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..484bfc6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/40/46146b676f1c7dc75534c42b3fd1df03753588
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+Return-Path: <bremner@tesseract.cs.unb.ca>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACCCE431FB6\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 00:03:03 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 2.438\r
+X-Spam-Level: **\r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.438 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL=2.438] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id OOIoCwrcVIwp for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Sun, 18 Jan 2015 00:03:00 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from yantan.tethera.net (yantan.tethera.net [199.188.72.155])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 824E3431FAF\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 00:03:00 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from remotemail by yantan.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.80)\r
+       (envelope-from <bremner@tesseract.cs.unb.ca>) id 1YCkp1-0004qK-Uy\r
+       for notmuch@notmuchmail.org; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 04:02:59 -0400\r
+Received: (nullmailer pid 18918 invoked by uid 1000); Sun, 18 Jan 2015\r
+       08:02:54 -0000\r
+From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>\r
+To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: S/MIME patches, v4\r
+Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 09:02:42 +0100\r
+Message-Id: <1421568167-18683-1-git-send-email-david@tethera.net>\r
+X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.1.4\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 08:03:03 -0000\r
+\r
+I took Jamie's advice and simplified the openssl based tests\r
+to ignore the actual output.\r
+\r
+I added a test to generate a signed+encrypted message, and verified\r
+that with openssl (in two steps).\r
+\r
+I'm a bit stumped why the test introduced in patch 5/5 is failing so\r
+badly. I'd give even odds that I haven't set up gpgsm right (only\r
+imported the public key and not the private one?). Still, it looks to\r
+me like there should be some more diagnostics from notmuch if the\r
+crypto is failing.\r
+\r
+\r