Re: [PATCH 2/3] show: output Reply-To headers
authorJameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>
Wed, 4 Jul 2012 02:22:18 +0000 (19:22 +1700)
committerW. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
Fri, 7 Nov 2014 17:47:58 +0000 (09:47 -0800)
ce/c3a577b15edccda8a21a65ab56c4cb17ff6a24 [new file with mode: 0644]

diff --git a/ce/c3a577b15edccda8a21a65ab56c4cb17ff6a24 b/ce/c3a577b15edccda8a21a65ab56c4cb17ff6a24
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..0f62d2e
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,93 @@
+Return-Path: <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B387431FBD\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue,  3 Jul 2012 19:22:25 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -2.29\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id WYdxDDN9n7vX for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Tue,  3 Jul 2012 19:22:24 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu\r
+       [131.215.239.19])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A284F431FB6\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue,  3 Jul 2012 19:22:24 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from fire-doxen.imss.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by fire-doxen-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22845328015;\r
+       Tue,  3 Jul 2012 19:22:24 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-IMSS on fire-doxen by amavisd-new\r
+Received: from finestructure.net (m16.ligo.caltech.edu [131.215.115.116])\r
+       (Authenticated sender: jrollins)\r
+       by fire-doxen-submit (Postfix) with ESMTP id 686D22E50E27;\r
+       Tue,  3 Jul 2012 19:22:21 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by finestructure.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)\r
+       id 34D422E7; Tue,  3 Jul 2012 19:22:21 -0700 (PDT)\r
+From: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+To: Peter Wang <novalazy@gmail.com>\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] show: output Reply-To headers\r
+In-Reply-To: <20120704115951.GC2342@hili.localdomain>\r
+References: <1340508470-16606-1-git-send-email-novalazy@gmail.com>\r
+       <1340508470-16606-2-git-send-email-novalazy@gmail.com>\r
+       <87vci471tw.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+       <20120704115951.GC2342@hili.localdomain>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.13.2+54~ga0426dc (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2012 19:22:18 -0700\r
+Message-ID: <87pq8c6zad.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
+       micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
+Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2012 02:22:25 -0000\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+\r
+On Tue, Jul 03 2012, Peter Wang <novalazy@gmail.com> wrote:\r
+> I want to see what the sender intended, before hitting reply.\r
+\r
+Given that there have been requests to see a lot of other headers as\r
+well, we probably need to have a discussion about which ones are worth\r
+of emitting, and how we give the user some more general control to see\r
+the ones they want.  Either that or we just emit them all?\r
+\r
+jamie.\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)\r
+\r
+iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJP86jbAAoJEO00zqvie6q8mu0QALAtzgHNKhjN1RN3r59zyg+4\r
+UTzaASiVTMD3X9oQggik/V2wvO6/RL7RKEMeLfgOfI511tF6bm1hhzgOOVzr/+VK\r
+sgwc1+XsZzU4AX0WRexaapHSMuBOwYuKpPk+jAQHdFWQv64awBBW1ZJDHKE47S4W\r
+/PmWxr0nkmwksg3xOZyjGeoGUDgPYg9IgpUlBXC0tT45Da45NKe7moR72IE840k/\r
+XL1GWheRgxOiBHU7yfoyQhdVH+MBhVbmYOpWKcqgI2QxrZQh19zsxomiC+BGTLZt\r
++YOG0GD46uVjSIv2xHy8wlwCUL6N8Ywqp0Y10/2naBjCx1UYDYavsaPOpBujUHY1\r
+IRYuVsIUa0Tkwi8uOB2G0cTMWyF2geyncA6797iqDFhFbUR7D+Q8kWKgjrByZVt2\r
+tndWGmHSzT2t6q2d1dw7jygaQkh3PUHQb07TFb/Qv3+dOo2PAStbwM8+d2BCzLSg\r
+iBOqY95iyUO3Uz/nO5l1XDQYBCMJAeH1yl4GwA++FCxv2JlVT8JGJDuf74WUqsqK\r
+9OFz+d6Bkdb8AsIicl2+bfdlJQeltL8rcMRnfRIu6VIZl2stCOaj4Mi5YN2esDWE\r
+LUUr7MPWg6yjTFozDchc8Wt5JaEzEqevAS0qguudb4bU5mVcaOb3VpffQDeQgYUE\r
+vniHkDmsIjkTIK8szKHf\r
+=tAur\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+--=-=-=--\r