bugfix release (was: heads up from the python front)

diff --git a/5f/e7f1b53d3e955126dd5b7c1149cecf16ee2698 b/5f/e7f1b53d3e955126dd5b7c1149cecf16ee2698
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..883f451
--- /dev/null
+++ b/5f/e7f1b53d3e955126dd5b7c1149cecf16ee2698
@@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
+Return-Path: <teythoon@jade-hamburg.de>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4372F431FBC\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 08:53:52 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION, Duplicate header field: "Date"\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0.432\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.432 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[INVALID_DATE=0.432] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id VCpop7ZSOu4C for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Sun, 29 Jan 2012 08:53:51 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from mail.cryptobitch.de (cryptobitch.de [88.198.7.68])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C4B7431FB6\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 08:53:51 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from mail.jade-hamburg.de (unknown [85.183.11.228])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by mail.cryptobitch.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D76D650D416\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 17:53:49 +0100 (CET)\r
+Received: by mail.jade-hamburg.de (Postfix, from userid 401)\r
+       id 5A8F1DF2A2; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 17:53:49 +0100 (CET)\r
+Received: from thinkbox.jade-hamburg.de (unknown [10.1.1.109])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: teythoon)\r
+       by mail.jade-hamburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 62A82DF2A0;\r
+       Sun, 29 Jan 2012 17:53:43 +0100 (CET)\r
+Received: from teythoon by thinkbox.jade-hamburg.de with local (Exim 4.77)\r
+       (envelope-from <teythoon@thinkbox.jade-hamburg.de>)\r
+       id 1RrY0c-0005xo-FS; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 17:53:42 +0100\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
+To: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>,\r
+       notmuch mailing list <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+From: Justus Winter <4winter@informatik.uni-hamburg.de>\r
+Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 16:53:42 -0000\r
+In-Reply-To: <87obtvc42c.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+References: <20120122060141.16806.41461@thinkbox.jade-hamburg.de>\r
+       <87obtvc42c.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+Message-ID: <20120129165342.4606.6358@thinkbox.jade-hamburg.de>\r
+User-Agent: alot/0.2-357-gcb95\r
+Subject: bugfix release (was: heads up from the python front)\r
+Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 17:53:42 +0100\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 16:53:52 -0000\r
+\r
+Hey David,\r
+\r
+Quoting David Bremner (2012-01-22 13:30:35)\r
+>On Sun, 22 Jan 2012 06:01:41 -0000, Justus Winter <4winter@informatik.uni-=\r
+hamburg.de> wrote:\r
+>> =\r
+\r
+>> I feel kind of bad since I severely broke the error handling for all\r
+>> pythonic notmuch users out there, is there any chance of a bugfix\r
+>> release? The patch[3] is really simple and I'd say it's trivial to\r
+>> backport it to the last release. What do you think?\r
+>> =\r
+\r
+>\r
+>I'm not opposed in principle; I tentatively plan on a bugfix release for\r
+>Aaron's mml quoting patch, so we can have the two fixes in one release.\r
+\r
+What about that bugfix release?\r
+\r
+Cheers,\r
+Justus\r