* in either the 'To' or 'Cc' header of the message?
*/
static int
-reply_to_header_is_redundant (notmuch_message_t *message, const char *reply_to)
+reply_to_header_is_redundant (notmuch_message_t *message,
+ InternetAddressList *reply_to_list)
{
const char *to, *cc, *addr;
- InternetAddressList *list;
InternetAddress *address;
InternetAddressMailbox *mailbox;
- list = internet_address_list_parse_string (reply_to);
-
- if (internet_address_list_length (list) != 1)
+ if (reply_to_list == NULL ||
+ internet_address_list_length (reply_to_list) != 1)
return 0;
- address = internet_address_list_get_address (list, 0);
+ address = internet_address_list_get_address (reply_to_list, 0);
if (INTERNET_ADDRESS_IS_GROUP (address))
return 0;
reply_to = g_mime_message_get_reply_to (mime_message);
if (reply_to && *reply_to) {
+ InternetAddressList *reply_to_list;
+
/*
* Some mailing lists munge the Reply-To header despite it
* being A Bad Thing, see
* to the list. Note that the address in the Reply-To header
* will always appear in the reply if reply_all is true.
*/
- if (! reply_to_header_is_redundant (message, reply_to))
- return internet_address_list_parse_string (reply_to);
+ reply_to_list = internet_address_list_parse_string (reply_to);
+ if (! reply_to_header_is_redundant (message, reply_to_list))
+ return reply_to_list;
+
+ g_object_unref (G_OBJECT (reply_to_list));
}
return internet_address_list_parse_string (