--- /dev/null
+Return-Path: <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CD1C429E52\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 12 Feb 2012 13:42:28 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -1.098\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+ tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,\r
+ NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id 818Vd-wvkvzP for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Sun, 12 Feb 2012 13:42:28 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from mail2.qmul.ac.uk (mail2.qmul.ac.uk [138.37.6.6])\r
+ (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+ (No client certificate requested)\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF00D431FAE\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 12 Feb 2012 13:42:27 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from smtp.qmul.ac.uk ([138.37.6.40])\r
+ by mail2.qmul.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.71)\r
+ (envelope-from <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>)\r
+ id 1RwhBe-0005uH-PZ; Sun, 12 Feb 2012 21:42:23 +0000\r
+Received: from 94-192-233-223.zone6.bethere.co.uk ([94.192.233.223]\r
+ helo=localhost)\r
+ by smtp.qmul.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.69)\r
+ (envelope-from <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>)\r
+ id 1RwhBe-00036a-Fz; Sun, 12 Feb 2012 21:42:22 +0000\r
+From: Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>\r
+To: Daniel Schoepe <daniel@schoepe.org>,\r
+ Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: RFC notmuch-pick: an emacs threaded message view with split-pane\r
+In-Reply-To: <877gzru5s4.fsf@schoepe.localhost>\r
+References: <87d39k1gvi.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+ <8762fb3hlf.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+ <877gzru5s4.fsf@schoepe.localhost>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11.1+192~g23e894e (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.2.1\r
+ (i486-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 21:43:42 +0000\r
+Message-ID: <8739afsp69.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+X-Sender-Host-Address: 94.192.233.223\r
+X-QM-SPAM-Info: Sender has good ham record. :)\r
+X-QM-Body-MD5: acdfca4cf8fecfe4115659f697539cc3 (of first 20000 bytes)\r
+X-SpamAssassin-Score: -1.8\r
+X-SpamAssassin-SpamBar: -\r
+X-SpamAssassin-Report: The QM spam filters have analysed this message to\r
+ determine if it is\r
+ spam. We require at least 5.0 points to mark a message as spam.\r
+ This message scored -1.8 points.\r
+ Summary of the scoring: \r
+ * -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,\r
+ * medium trust\r
+ * [138.37.6.40 listed in list.dnswl.org]\r
+ * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail\r
+ provider * (markwalters1009[at]gmail.com)\r
+ * -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay\r
+ * domain\r
+ * 0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list\r
+X-QM-Scan-Virus: ClamAV says the message is clean\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 21:42:28 -0000\r
+\r
+\r
+On Sun, 12 Feb 2012 21:59:39 +0100, Daniel Schoepe <daniel@schoepe.org> wrote:\r
+> On Sun, 12 Feb 2012 12:46:36 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net> wrote:\r
+> > Hey, Mark. I really like the idea, since I've been looking for\r
+> > something like this for a while, but there's something I'm confused\r
+> > about. Is this meant to replace notmuch-search, or notmuch-show? I had\r
+> > been hoping for a notmuch *show* replacement that shows the nice tree\r
+> > view for the thread, with a single message view below. But it sounds\r
+> > like you're meant to be replacing notmuch search? That seems confusing\r
+> > to me, particularly in light of the big performance hit you describe.\r
+> \r
+> As far as I can tell, it is intended as a third option and can be used\r
+> for both, viewing all messages matching a search in a tree structure\r
+> (with a pane for an individual message) as in most other mail clients\r
+> (mutt, thunderbird, Gnus, etc.) and viewing a single thread in the\r
+> manner you described.\r
+> \r
+> This has the added bonus, that it can be offered _in addition_ to show\r
+> in search, since I wouldn't want to give up the current\r
+> search-view. notmuch-show might also be preferred by some users (due to\r
+> its similarity to sup and gmail). Of course, this would mean that we\r
+> would have to maintain threading capabilities for two modes. (It relies\r
+> on show for displaying a single message, so that part is not\r
+> duplicated).\r
+\r
+This is exactly my view: it comes somewhere between search and show. I\r
+use it both ways: as a view for my inbox (i.e., as a replacement for\r
+search) and when I get lost "showing" a long thread. \r
+\r
+I haven't tried Daniel's suggestion of notmuch-search-pick (going from a\r
+thread to the pick view of that thread). But I will add it as an option.\r
+\r
+Best wishes\r
+\r
+Mark\r
projects / notmuch-archives.git / commitdiff