Re: Cannot apply multiple tags to a selection in search view

diff --git a/89/9eafab12deee5d09a65a27550742345e9f739c b/89/9eafab12deee5d09a65a27550742345e9f739c
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..55f5f06
--- /dev/null
+++ b/89/9eafab12deee5d09a65a27550742345e9f739c
@@ -0,0 +1,111 @@
+Return-Path: <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DAE5431FBD\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 25 May 2014 16:35:15 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0.502\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.502 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,\r
+       NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id 9WzJ9XOlEZoX for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Sun, 25 May 2014 16:35:11 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from mail1.qmul.ac.uk (mail1.qmul.ac.uk [138.37.6.7])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64C26431FAF\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 25 May 2014 16:35:11 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from smtp.qmul.ac.uk ([138.37.6.40])\r
+       by mail1.qmul.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.71)\r
+       (envelope-from <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>)\r
+       id 1WohwC-00044Y-FT; Mon, 26 May 2014 00:35:07 +0100\r
+Received: from 5751dfa2.skybroadband.com ([87.81.223.162] helo=localhost)\r
+       by smtp.qmul.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.71)\r
+       (envelope-from <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>)\r
+       id 1WohwC-0008IS-2m; Mon, 26 May 2014 00:34:44 +0100\r
+From: Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>\r
+To: mailinglists@nawaz.org, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: Cannot apply multiple tags to a selection in search view\r
+In-Reply-To: <87d2f1jxof.fsf@nawaz.org>\r
+References: <87d2f1jxof.fsf@nawaz.org>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.15.2+615~g78e3a93 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Mon, 26 May 2014 00:34:40 +0100\r
+Message-ID: <87k3995t67.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+X-Sender-Host-Address: 87.81.223.162\r
+X-QM-Geographic: According to ripencc,\r
+       this message was delivered by a machine in Britain (UK) (GB).\r
+X-QM-SPAM-Info: Sender has good ham record.  :)\r
+X-QM-Body-MD5: 2fa7c6619bdb29854e0bb909a1f55da0 (of first 20000 bytes)\r
+X-SpamAssassin-Score: -0.1\r
+X-SpamAssassin-SpamBar: /\r
+X-SpamAssassin-Report: The QM spam filters have analysed this message to\r
+       determine if it is\r
+       spam. We require at least 5.0 points to mark a message as spam.\r
+       This message scored -0.1 points.\r
+       Summary of the scoring: \r
+       * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail\r
+       provider *      (markwalters1009[at]gmail.com)\r
+       * -0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list\r
+X-QM-Scan-Virus: ClamAV says the message is clean\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 May 2014 23:35:15 -0000\r
+\r
+\r
+Hi\r
+\r
+I think notmuch-search-tag (and other tagging functions) were cleaned up\r
+for 0.17: in particular their interactive behaviour\r
+changed. notmuch-search-tag now only looks at the region if called\r
+interactively. I think the following would do what you want\r
+\r
+(define-key notmuch-search-mode-map "d"\r
+  (lambda (beg end) "Delete message."\r
+         (interactive (notmuch-search-interactive-region))\r
+         (notmuch-search-tag '("+delete" "-inbox" "-lowpriority" "-@review" "-@respond" "-unread") beg end)))\r
+\r
+Best wishes\r
+\r
+Mark\r
+\r
+On Sun, 25 May 2014, mailinglists@nawaz.org wrote:\r
+> Hi,\r
+>\r
+> After upgrading to version 0.17, the following function that used to\r
+> work fine in the past misbehaves when I select multiple messages:\r
+>\r
+> (define-key notmuch-search-mode-map "d"\r
+>       (lambda ()\r
+>         "Delete message."  (interactive) (notmuch-search-tag\r
+>         '("+delete" "-inbox" "-lowpriority" "-@review" "-@respond"\r
+>         "-unread"))))\r
+>\r
+> If I press "d", it only applies the tags to the message my cursor is\r
+> on - not my whole message.\r
+>\r
+> If I manually execute the notmuch-search-tag command, it does work on\r
+> the whole selection, though.\r
+>\r
+> Any ideas?\r
+>\r
+> Thanks!  _______________________________________________ notmuch\r
+> mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+> http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch\r