--- /dev/null
+Return-Path: <gmn-notmuch@m.gmane.org>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BDCF431FAF\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 02:39:06 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+ tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id gEsYC6pdUbaN for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Tue, 12 Mar 2013 02:39:05 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3])\r
+ (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+ (No client certificate requested)\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9AF2E431FAE\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 02:39:05 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)\r
+ (envelope-from <gmn-notmuch@m.gmane.org>) id 1UFLg0-0004Gm-FG\r
+ for notmuch@notmuchmail.org; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 10:39:20 +0100\r
+Received: from c83-249-23-194.bredband.comhem.se ([83.249.23.194])\r
+ by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))\r
+ id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 10:39:20 +0100\r
+Received: from quite by c83-249-23-194.bredband.comhem.se with local (Gmexim\r
+ 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 10:39:20 +0100\r
+X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/\r
+To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+From: Daniel <quite@hack.org>\r
+Subject: synchronizing tag for cur/new location of mail\r
+Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 09:38:44 +0000 (UTC)\r
+Lines: 10\r
+Message-ID: <khmt34$7k2$1@ger.gmane.org>\r
+X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org\r
+X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c83-249-23-194.bredband.comhem.se\r
+User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (Linux)\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 09:39:06 -0000\r
+\r
+Is there currently no automatic tag that reflects whether a mail was\r
+found in folder/cur or folder/new? The "unread" tag properly reflects\r
+the maildir ",S" flag, but the one named "new" doesn't seem to be\r
+automatic in any way, right?\r
+\r
+I mostly use notmuch as a search backend to mutt, and it certainly is\r
+very useful. Though since I started feeding rss to maildir, I would like\r
+the idea of presenting somewhere in my system a list of new and "unseen"\r
+mails (in the mutt sense, kind of, which you might be familiar with).\r
+Presently this seems impossible.\r
+\r