--- /dev/null
+Return-Path: <fatkasuvayu+linux@gmail.com>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50DDF6DE132D\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 01:40:25 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.719\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.719 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.101,\r
+ DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,\r
+ RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01,\r
+ SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id KnJPtefM2gYh for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Tue, 30 Jun 2015 01:40:22 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from mail-wi0-f179.google.com (mail-wi0-f179.google.com\r
+ [209.85.212.179])\r
+ by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BAE46DE09FB\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 01:40:22 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by wiar9 with SMTP id r9so28261688wia.1\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 01:40:20 -0700 (PDT)\r
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;\r
+ h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references\r
+ :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to\r
+ :user-agent; bh=G21NRWwzZ2bATre9Ikv1QArlJdeCFScg2lkixP1IhUQ=;\r
+ b=gJhq+jz9q1A12DdtoPefE6yCgZZwf/LKolvsXLJ3Al/aFr9rdlaJ0HrPDaTV+GfHSe\r
+ sWBcSeUAy1NO1kS7MiUlBE5P7OpxedRkcJOLKlPZQsSIQyfecTo+0oGy7ze8hTKt4aL3\r
+ 7FUPen6nOlIc94bWqT+mx87Hfxbt9DijB6MReMzVKnTqv0Nvu0e86CrsSPCJE50X9VeU\r
+ 2ccbl/47NRe8VjIQ5bRsMAYsSJ3+jD74sna8It/jSqIRa+YnT9hpp5Sp5R2q0ozzmKAP\r
+ 1BF9ImVJa4Z/8xmfUP3uw9THi7pT2bJO/l66phbk4de5XD6DmNnNLrDZvNrM/G0Hp7xy\r
+ bU7w==\r
+X-Received: by 10.180.90.11 with SMTP id bs11mr31294388wib.52.1435653620557;\r
+ Tue, 30 Jun 2015 01:40:20 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from chitra.no-ip.org (ip82-139-115-46.lijbrandt.net.\r
+ [82.139.115.46])\r
+ by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ma15sm15943834wic.20.2015.06.30.01.40.19\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+ (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);\r
+ Tue, 30 Jun 2015 01:40:20 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Sender: Suvayu Ali <fatkasuvayu@gmail.com>\r
+Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 10:40:18 +0200\r
+From: Suvayu Ali <fatkasuvayu+linux@gmail.com>\r
+To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: notmuch release 0.20.2 now available\r
+Message-ID: <20150630084018.GO24926@chitra.no-ip.org>\r
+Mail-Followup-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+References: <87h9pplqer.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>\r
+ <20150630063942.GM24926@chitra.no-ip.org>\r
+ <87a8vhlkdv.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+Content-Disposition: inline\r
+In-Reply-To: <87a8vhlkdv.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>\r
+User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1 (2014-03-12)\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 08:40:25 -0000\r
+\r
+Hi David,\r
+\r
+On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 09:34:36AM +0200, David Bremner wrote:\r
+> Suvayu Ali <fatkasuvayu+linux@gmail.com> writes:\r
+> > On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 07:24:28AM +0200, David Bremner wrote:\r
+> >> \r
+> >> Where to obtain notmuch 0.20.2\r
+> >> ===========================\r
+> >> http://notmuchmail.org/releases/notmuch-0.20.2.tar.gz\r
+> >\r
+> > I took a quick pass at building the release for Fedora. The ruby\r
+> > bindings seem to fail to build (actually linking fails).\r
+> >\r
+> \r
+> The ruby bindings are not built automatically by 0.20.2. You seem to be\r
+> building a snapshot of master. If you want to build the release from\r
+> git, use the signed tag.\r
+\r
+Yes, I was aware. I tried again with proper 0.20.2. And everything\r
+succeeds. So I guess something with master. I usually build master in\r
+that repo, I guess I'll stick to the release for now.\r
+\r
+> The question of why master won't build for you is also interesting, but\r
+> a different question. A quick search reveals packages of notmuch 0.19\r
+> ruby bindings seemingly for fc22\r
+> \r
+> https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/ruby-notmuch/contents\r
+> \r
+> So I guess have a look and see what existing fedora packaging does.\r
+\r
+Yes, I have looked at what the official packages[1] do, I do exactly the\r
+same[2]. Essentially the spec file does the following:\r
+\r
+ pushd bindings/ruby\r
+ ruby extconf.rb --vendor --with-cflags="%{optflags}"\r
+ make %{?_smp_mflags}\r
+ popd\r
+\r
+where, _smp_mflags is -jN, and optflags is options for gcc. If you need\r
+the specific flags, I can try to look it up.\r
+\r
+> At the moment the only way to disable the ruby bindings (other than\r
+> hacking the build system) is not to have the ruby development files in\r
+> the build env. This may change by the time this is part of a release.\r
+\r
+Since everything is built in a chroot, I have control over the build\r
+environment via the spec file. If need be, I can disable it. However\r
+it would be interesting to know why master fails.\r
+\r
+Thanks for your comments.\r
+\r
+Cheers,\r
+\r
+Footnotes:\r
+\r
+[1] http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/notmuch.git/tree/notmuch.spec#n137\r
+[2] https://github.com/suvayu/notmuch-spec/blob/master/notmuch.spec#L139\r
+\r
+-- \r
+Suvayu\r
+\r
+Open source is the future. It sets us free.\r