Re: [PATCH] remove message archiving from show-advance-and-archive

diff --git a/50/7d7c11fe9e43833285995769dceafb2216eab1 b/50/7d7c11fe9e43833285995769dceafb2216eab1
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..e2a9d78
--- /dev/null
+++ b/50/7d7c11fe9e43833285995769dceafb2216eab1
@@ -0,0 +1,101 @@
+Return-Path: <dme@dme.org>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DAE24196F0\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed,  9 Jun 2010 10:54:45 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -1.89\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.89 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=ham\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id Zr7wioHm3Um1 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Wed,  9 Jun 2010 10:54:35 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from mail-wy0-f181.google.com (mail-wy0-f181.google.com\r
+       [74.125.82.181])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA5E7431FC1\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed,  9 Jun 2010 10:54:34 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by wyb35 with SMTP id 35so4920498wyb.26\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 09 Jun 2010 10:54:33 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by 10.227.137.69 with SMTP id v5mr2465187wbt.208.1276105620818;\r
+       Wed, 09 Jun 2010 10:47:00 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from ut.hh.sledj.net (gmp-ea-fw-1b.sun.com [192.18.8.1])\r
+       by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u19sm12992967wbc.2.2010.06.09.10.46.59\r
+       (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);\r
+       Wed, 09 Jun 2010 10:47:00 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by ut.hh.sledj.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)\r
+       id 1AFB5594015; Wed,  9 Jun 2010 18:47:32 +0100 (BST)\r
+To: Jameson Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>,\r
+       Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH] remove message archiving from show-advance-and-archive\r
+In-Reply-To: <877hm8xgfp.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+References: <87zkz4xnf4.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+       <874ohctf2h.fsf@ut.hh.sledj.net>\r
+       <87sk4wxm7j.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+       <87wru8rze2.fsf@ut.hh.sledj.net>\r
+       <87hblcxksa.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+       <87typcruod.fsf@ut.hh.sledj.net>\r
+       <877hm8xgfp.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.3.1-50-gc535d0a (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.1.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+From: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>\r
+Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 18:47:28 +0100\r
+Message-ID: <87r5kgrtcf.fsf@ut.hh.sledj.net>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
+       micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 17:54:45 -0000\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
+\r
+On Wed, 09 Jun 2010 13:29:46 -0400, Jameson Rollins <jrollins@finestructure=\r
+.net> wrote:\r
+> I'm advocating that *only* the "unread" tag ever be automatically\r
+> removed in the emacs UI when doing anything other than explicitly\r
+> removing tags (eg. like just opening a message for viewing, or browsing\r
+> through a thread, etc.).  All other tags should only ever be explicitly\r
+> modified by the user.\r
+\r
+Understood. Presumably the automatic tag addition would also remain.\r
+\r
+> If users want to have special tag manipulation procedures to match their\r
+> needs, then they can easily build the needed functions and bind them to\r
+> whichever keys they wish.\r
+\r
+In general I'd agree. The 'advance-and-archive' case is different,\r
+because it's behaviour is bound up in the logic of the function. It's\r
+not easy to just add that in on top with a simple key binding.\r
+\r
+In any case, I don't care enough to argue more. Go for it.\r
+\r
+dme.\r
+=2D-=20\r
+David Edmondson, http://dme.org\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)\r
+\r
+iEYEARECAAYFAkwP07EACgkQaezQq/BJZRZ2pgCeJqw9+Je55SO1/4sVGbltpppB\r
+JYsAnA9Pd/DFNwEGEJoNECt3cx7TbRqr\r
+=/0FY\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+--=-=-=--\r