Re: [PATCH] emacs: Leave blank subjects alone by default.

diff --git a/2b/a5420417361c5774d0cabe043a3efa480d0ff0 b/2b/a5420417361c5774d0cabe043a3efa480d0ff0
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..109ebc8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/2b/a5420417361c5774d0cabe043a3efa480d0ff0
@@ -0,0 +1,98 @@
+Return-Path: <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEDD8429E52\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 12 Feb 2012 12:51:08 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -2.29\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id 87s7Uep6JTUT for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Sun, 12 Feb 2012 12:51:08 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu\r
+       [131.215.239.19])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CA39431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 12 Feb 2012 12:51:08 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from fire-doxen.imss.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by fire-doxen-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCE702E50E39;\r
+       Sun, 12 Feb 2012 12:51:03 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-IMSS on fire-doxen by amavisd-new\r
+Received: from finestructure.net (cpe-76-174-137-84.socal.res.rr.com\r
+       [76.174.137.84]) (Authenticated sender: jrollins)\r
+       by fire-doxen-submit (Postfix) with ESMTP id 118D02E50D39;\r
+       Sun, 12 Feb 2012 12:51:01 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: by finestructure.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)\r
+       id B8E584DE; Sun, 12 Feb 2012 12:51:00 -0800 (PST)\r
+From: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+To: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH] emacs: Leave blank subjects alone by default.\r
+In-Reply-To: <1328563816-12960-1-git-send-email-dme@dme.org>\r
+References: <1327496913-4946-1-git-send-email-dme@dme.org>\r
+       <1328563816-12960-1-git-send-email-dme@dme.org>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11.1+156~gde94716 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 12:51:00 -0800\r
+Message-ID: <8739af3he3.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
+       micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 20:51:09 -0000\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
+\r
+On Mon,  6 Feb 2012 21:30:16 +0000, David Edmondson <dme@dme.org> wrote:\r
+> Add `notmuch-blank-subject' to control how empty or whitespace only\r
+> subjects are treated. The default behaviour is to leave them\r
+> alone. The user can choose a string to use as a replacement.\r
+>=20\r
+> Modify code that cannot handle blank subjects to use a fixed string.\r
+\r
+Hey, David.  I still think this is a lot of unnecessary code to deal\r
+with what seems to be an issue with notmuch-print.el only.  I honestly\r
+just don't see the point of replacing blank subjects with some other\r
+string in all these circumstances.\r
+\r
+Can't we just revert the original patch and just provide the needed fix\r
+to print.el alone?\r
+\r
+jamie.\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)\r
+\r
+iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJPOCY0AAoJEO00zqvie6q8LwsQAJrbj8l3F+PVK5dwgf3K5IQm\r
+LnPiqi37TM3np7/NMwG0mjpYBl+PdHPgz/l/02nLYXF2oCg8Bg5akMy2411lH2eo\r
+AzcR/G1JN7pBhNFNYkRdw7ClSDP5bW+rLMM3rR9w264ZKCOYRg+Zn2+0XfltdN1x\r
+GqRPyGPVwLrGJalvUueEtYSAqjlMi+dH3e05qsCjc+bdii9wC3jYuBWoR1P0GqLC\r
+fpBovHj8BCtQWFJNcVQb3BR+vHn78JMYq6UlG6bODt1AkSXHwdZXG2ku1Oukci2Z\r
+vo1IZWZi+WYtU6cU2KJSS4vFb/CP5UBlb4R96g2BWIy/GMB4GICidM4hoe3Ug6CO\r
+gJWKihk+RmeVj/uvcE1x1iQhbAyCTLRBnhho/EzRwfYsxNHppVdv4TVbgxXZy1zR\r
+HRvpLP4WfitTBEUVu5SdMaRsdKfFZX/XdNf643qVO+HgE7rLeNPME62w+dZg8KxJ\r
+BpAY8rjiOJTC92eI7cqw3iVmdWp5Lh5D+It/in79467Q4w5tegBQfwuA1LIVhkLG\r
+m/GkmShCoz3UQbParAf9bDbmguHuEYWh97mR4Bbt/9OhcbDWyT3HkB6d3+Q3yHEX\r
+M8dNVmI9l6PXSkk5R3AGVxO+8boJ8BnyrhstFkM2l8AL2XOZ42bOQ9YGZc3SzeTF\r
++DxfgykHVn31Ol39BGMw\r
+=QEaW\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+--=-=-=--\r