--- /dev/null
+Return-Path: <jeremy@nickurak.ca>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DD7C431FBC\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 7 Apr 2014 13:15:47 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.699\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+ tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,\r
+ RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id f-zNb80xr+hA for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Mon, 7 Apr 2014 13:15:43 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from mail-wg0-f52.google.com (mail-wg0-f52.google.com\r
+ [74.125.82.52]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client\r
+ certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id\r
+ CE78B431FB6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 7 Apr 2014 13:15:42 -0700\r
+ (PDT)\r
+Received: by mail-wg0-f52.google.com with SMTP id k14so7284461wgh.11\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 07 Apr 2014 13:15:39 -0700 (PDT)\r
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;\r
+ d=nickurak.ca; s=google-dkim;\r
+ h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject\r
+ :from:to:cc:content-type;\r
+ bh=LKxfFXILWwQZzNgaC9b4Rgy6I6SfN53YYA6O8poG1vg=;\r
+ b=iD9LlLvvAGo+n5PkfdFD9FHw1eFrkhACC8hJxU7IKvxH0ffkjsUJS2s8/7O/x08BhN\r
+ TSpndMgCJwqqLqTokMhoeGkpWB5mmHoy825ZJtUMdODKDIS3bX1jafhQ2NicPuqIuqTR\r
+ aTgfxjgE7O+211VrzZ/ELy2mnQ4qkLejkIxr8=\r
+X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;\r
+ d=1e100.net; s=20130820;\r
+ h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date\r
+ :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;\r
+ bh=LKxfFXILWwQZzNgaC9b4Rgy6I6SfN53YYA6O8poG1vg=;\r
+ b=OhDCG+avvyech26PBBFAMti3D76iWfyf7tdW1dOv8PzJZsvlK32vrRYe8rsJClCo2T\r
+ HTbUblev52E28/8RwkeSb8XucMg8vhELxb/Kx9D/mP/fz4jVnZ1eEJ0VVV+J3riQoVif\r
+ hOdsQcnbIWDoWeEAIidSkksnOdC8Fng25SGYtYCrUun6J5bW76FvI4ZjpGswVnGDg2AL\r
+ Gq7L0PK6iJ5IK/W1mM61nbxkmhEuKdLrdmt2SEX1yruJ7xuUzz5tAKI3aUU1NDN3HnXc\r
+ nxZ2tqfxMJ6+E7V+DPTMq0Tl1nqXfutL906CLRbxPFfFstoGOIdIwso1rpdQMTYJ/2GR\r
+ g4QQ==\r
+X-Gm-Message-State:\r
+ ALoCoQn/ApUEs9h2ZoPmWspDAMrXjSaEzX/MFm7ZudpbGh1HDTciXN+HxQp3Ry/+c1n+S4iEOhJf\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+X-Received: by 10.180.187.16 with SMTP id fo16mr27651365wic.26.1396901738620; \r
+ Mon, 07 Apr 2014 13:15:38 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Sender: jeremy@nickurak.ca\r
+Received: by 10.216.122.200 with HTTP; Mon, 7 Apr 2014 13:15:38 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Originating-IP: [96.52.225.98]\r
+In-Reply-To: <87ob0dnndk.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+References: <86k3b3ybo6.fsf@someserver.somewhere>\r
+ <878urj1z3j.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>\r
+ <87txa7pp8z.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+ <20140406091516.GG26903@vilya.m0g.net>\r
+ <5341D252.90405@fifthhorseman.net>\r
+ <867g71y327.fsf@someserver.somewhere>\r
+ <87ob0dnndk.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2014 14:15:38 -0600\r
+X-Google-Sender-Auth: 4SGmkatDRk1EbIPV5yGoeeOkIm0\r
+Message-ID:\r
+ <CA+eQo_3hUAc3uMWw6Hb2JLBATiBDS96GozCa5jqT_1sWz1Y=hQ@mail.gmail.com>\r
+Subject: Re: Feature suggestion. Indexing encrypted mail?\r
+From: Jeremy Nickurak <not-much@trk.nickurak.ca>\r
+To: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c266c4eac32c04f6798718\r
+Cc: Notmuch Mailing List <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>,\r
+ Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>,\r
+ Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@debian.org>\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2014 20:15:47 -0000\r
+\r
+--001a11c266c4eac32c04f6798718\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\r
+\r
+Nonetheess, if you can tell from the index that a given message contains\r
+the words "hotel" "wine" "wife" "secret" and "rendezvous", you can infer a\r
+*lot* about the contents of encrypted contents of the message.\r
+\r
+\r
+On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Jameson Graef Rollins <\r
+jrollins@finestructure.net> wrote:\r
+\r
+> On Mon, Apr 07 2014, john.wyzer@gmx.de wrote:\r
+> >> confess i haven't been following closely), it wouldn't be much extra\r
+> >> effort for someone to implement a filter that strips encryption from the\r
+> >> message. (this might still have the problem mentioned above about also\r
+> >> stripping PGP/MIME signatures, but the signatures and the decrypted\r
+> >> message itself would remain intact so they could be shown directly by\r
+> >> notmuch show without trouble).\r
+> >\r
+> > I don't understand that. :-(\r
+> > This sounds as if the view of the message is not generated from the\r
+> > mail storage. Isn't the purpose of the index to find the appropriate\r
+> > message file and everything else is generated from that file?\r
+>\r
+> I think that's exactly what Daniel is saying: what's viewed comes from\r
+> the message directly, and not from the db.\r
+>\r
+> jamie.\r
+>\r
+> _______________________________________________\r
+> notmuch mailing list\r
+> notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+> http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch\r
+>\r
+>\r
+\r
+--001a11c266c4eac32c04f6798718\r
+Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
+\r
+<div dir=3D"ltr">Nonetheess, if you can tell from the index that a given me=\r
+ssage contains the words "hotel" "wine" "wife"=\r
+; "secret" and "rendezvous", you can infer a *lot* abou=\r
+t the contents of encrypted contents of the message.</div>\r
+<div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Mon, Apr 7=\r
+, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Jameson Graef Rollins <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"m=\r
+ailto:jrollins@finestructure.net" target=3D"_blank">jrollins@finestructure.=\r
+net</a>></span> wrote:<br>\r
+<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=\r
+x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class=3D"">On Mon, Apr 07 2014, <a href=\r
+=3D"mailto:john.wyzer@gmx.de">john.wyzer@gmx.de</a> wrote:<br>\r
+>> confess i haven't been following closely), it wouldn't be =\r
+much extra<br>\r
+>> effort for someone to implement a filter that strips encryption fr=\r
+om the<br>\r
+>> message. =C2=A0(this might still have the problem mentioned above =\r
+about also<br>\r
+>> stripping PGP/MIME signatures, but the signatures and the decrypte=\r
+d<br>\r
+>> message itself would remain intact so they could be shown directly=\r
+ by<br>\r
+>> notmuch show without trouble).<br>\r
+><br>\r
+> I don't understand that. :-(<br>\r
+> This sounds as if the view of the message is not generated from the<br=\r
+>\r
+> mail storage. Isn't the purpose of the index to find the appropria=\r
+te<br>\r
+> message file and everything else is generated from that file?<br>\r
+<br>\r
+</div>I think that's exactly what Daniel is saying: what's viewed c=\r
+omes from<br>\r
+the message directly, and not from the db.<br>\r
+<br>\r
+jamie.<br>\r
+<br>_______________________________________________<br>\r
+notmuch mailing list<br>\r
+<a href=3D"mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org">notmuch@notmuchmail.org</a><br>\r
+<a href=3D"http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch" target=3D"_blan=\r
+k">http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch</a><br>\r
+<br></blockquote></div><br></div>\r
+\r
+--001a11c266c4eac32c04f6798718--\r
projects / notmuch-archives.git / commitdiff