Re: Possible addtions to notmuch new ?

diff --git a/eb/b1f083a5f734d5f52b72a0ade62aeffd561a90 b/eb/b1f083a5f734d5f52b72a0ade62aeffd561a90
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..0314b0d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/eb/b1f083a5f734d5f52b72a0ade62aeffd561a90
@@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
+Return-Path: <awg@xvx.ca>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1415F431FAF\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 08:53:41 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.7\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id KLgFW4X89YiG for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Mon, 12 Aug 2013 08:53:32 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from mail-we0-f176.google.com (mail-we0-f176.google.com\r
+       [74.125.82.176]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85C96431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 08:53:32 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by mail-we0-f176.google.com with SMTP id q56so5577040wes.21\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 08:53:31 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;\r
+       d=google.com; s=20120113;\r
+       h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date\r
+       :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;\r
+       bh=kzHyLccyDs+1hPY7LHAxSAKQhAjOxJwGSXl3Q2c4OyU=;\r
+       b=iYe5PdIEB7aza6iAUwOgZKe4yZcGFqEUtuZ3bF50t9fKE7PzaZDQWOtnVoNNKhgaw0\r
+       9uGWrWCyKRpBKEXbbyoDijJihd/Gd+z6CV66aabHTTq2Coi/oqJWxO6DkbWw5Gk4y824\r
+       ToYK+aGsHP/LAkhe5Qb5j3RYelZtiDmyi5F8mtw5EEAytO8bVr83y6IQ91lEwZei1sF5\r
+       ihWGzF27KqxQ2YyYdMu26dnVjXape3SnLu59LQRcw7nK78uJyT2JJ5eUILKYS7ZO8jjr\r
+       c82imr9gjU3HNvn/R6s/3+NDBBSFYZzrUy9AaRkUHtTItlzdScTMMgQ8vmpzQMLm6xYf\r
+       c/4g==\r
+X-Gm-Message-State:\r
+ ALoCoQnhtRnromAqJ0O1EBx0SjQxFppan2F/EmewO4ghuLbN7lBQ4bEnq+8djjRSyA88m+LdfnVB\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+X-Received: by 10.195.13.45 with SMTP id ev13mr8816941wjd.20.1376322811398;\r
+       Mon, 12 Aug 2013 08:53:31 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Sender: awg@xvx.ca\r
+Received: by 10.194.35.35 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 08:53:31 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Originating-IP: [68.150.39.45]\r
+In-Reply-To: <20130812093443.GB16684@virt.cz.oracle.com>\r
+References: <20130812093443.GB16684@virt.cz.oracle.com>\r
+Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 09:53:31 -0600\r
+X-Google-Sender-Auth: zs92Be8bMoNm8FNh61mYyFIOeVw\r
+Message-ID:\r
+ <CAMoJFUuQRgAmgn0388gjCzkQkmNKF-JG0ePse6SBhYOUjDavXA@mail.gmail.com>\r
+Subject: Re: Possible addtions to notmuch new ?\r
+From: Adam Wolfe Gordon <awg+notmuch@xvx.ca>\r
+To: Vladimir Marek <Vladimir.Marek@oracle.com>\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1\r
+Cc: Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 15:53:41 -0000\r
+\r
+On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 3:34 AM, Vladimir Marek\r
+<Vladimir.Marek@oracle.com> wrote:\r
+> [dir] would limit the scope of 'notmuch' new search to dir and it's\r
+> subdirectories. Alternatively we could have set of include or exclude\r
+> rules similarly to rsync (for example), but [dir] is easier to\r
+> implement.\r
+\r
+I sent a series recently that added a command to essentially run\r
+'notmuch new' on a single message file. One reviewer suggested that I\r
+make it an option to notmuch new rather than its own command, which I\r
+think is is a good idea.\r
+\r
+When I have some time to get back to that patch series, I'll make the\r
+change as suggested. I think it makes sense to let it take either a\r
+subdirectory or a single file, which would make it work for this part\r
+of your usecase.\r
+\r
+-- Adam\r