--- /dev/null
+Return-Path: <vashirov@redhat.com>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED3046DE0173\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 09:02:20 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -5.027\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.027 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.005,\r
+ RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01,\r
+ SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01]\r
+ autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id dGLqX3hwHyg3 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Wed, 3 Aug 2016 09:02:09 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28])\r
+ by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A20E26DE0005\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 09:02:09 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com\r
+ (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27])\r
+ (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))\r
+ (No client certificate requested)\r
+ by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B68EA4E327;\r
+ Wed, 3 Aug 2016 16:02:08 +0000 (UTC)\r
+Received: from slowpoke.usersys.redhat.com.redhat.com\r
+ (ovpn-204-32.brq.redhat.com [10.40.204.32])\r
+ by int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id\r
+ u73G24BG021684\r
+ (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO);\r
+ Wed, 3 Aug 2016 12:02:07 -0400\r
+From: Viktor Ashirov <vashirov@redhat.com>\r
+To: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: notmuch-emacs should correctly handle signature status on reply\r
+In-Reply-To: <87d1lpdg5e.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net>\r
+References: <87invii1t7.fsf@slowpoke.usersys.redhat.com>\r
+ <87d1lpdg5e.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.21 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/25.0.94.1\r
+ (x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 18:02:03 +0200\r
+Message-ID: <87popp6dtw.fsf@slowpoke.usersys.redhat.com>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
+ micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
+X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.27\r
+X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16\r
+ (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.38]); Wed, 03 Aug 2016 16:02:08 +0000 (UTC)\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 16:02:21 -0000\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+\r
+On Wed, Aug 03 2016 at 11:30:05 am, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net> wrote:\r
+> On Wed 2016-08-03 06:28:36 -0400, Viktor Ashirov wrote:\r
+>\r
+>> in notmuch-emacs, when I reply to multipart/signed email, signature\r
+>> status gets inserted in the cited message, like this:\r
+>>\r
+>> ----------\r
+>> John Doe writes:\r
+>>> [ Unknown signature status ]\r
+>>> Hello world!\r
+>> ----------\r
+>>\r
+>> Even though signature was verified when email is viewed in notmuch-show\r
+>> ----------\r
+>> [ multipart/signed ]\r
+>> [ Good signature by: John Doe <jdoe@example.org> ]\r
+>> [ text/plain ]\r
+>> ----------\r
+>>\r
+>> So I'd like to be able to\r
+>> 1. Not include signature status in the cited message\r
+>> 2. But when I want to include it, it should be correctly processed.\r
+>\r
+> fwiw, i think that the cited message should never include signature or\r
+> decryption status, and the presence of these fields in the output of\r
+> notmuch-reply is a bug.\r
+>\r
+> I see no reason to make it configurable to show them, and some good\r
+> reasons not to: it's arguably a leak of information about your private\r
+> view of the world to include this stuff in a reply (the user can always\r
+> choose to write about their private view of the world manually if they\r
+> want to).\r
+I see your point, and I agree.\r
+>\r
+> notmuch-emacs already has too many options, and we should be\r
+> parsimonious about adding new ones.\r
+>\r
+> i suggest dropping the signature and encryption status entirely from\r
+> notmuch-reply.\r
+Sounds good to me.\r
+>\r
+> --dkg\r
+--\r
+Viktor\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v2\r
+\r
+iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJXohV7AAoJENolJPs2TTN4C8wP/2ARrM9TgvE2icrUuTT8pW07\r
+++j7IGEFD97WZGz4B2P5Uuepzb3WEpLPDMtJMuquScc3KOOWM8eArTbwt6XoZl9w\r
+Iem56Y4Bm3uri6JWs8bQBzS5yowE/no2xQ3CyTNjhAN1mzC1KV92vz3nzJGZ7ejc\r
+MU0FtHuOsKTklP7+8B4gfVOPv3EB7y3HReQ7uxg2o5SeE9MqrP8zTKjTrnxiKIf7\r
+pJNGo2zy/+FlE7F3bseFu2INyVS1Bajmoy9+qQ6r82l83+kFx4PbksV8QJhCvTMg\r
+RfAfGejfCLkMiba9An/5PlbYF46mK5dlrjQ+zhTBa8JB3dCLPH+X2QzL3+CnKhFc\r
+ClyGf9xPYC1r+FuIXzR86T8/z0+T5b/NuFTvO9qcouTSCwDz9RrDctSw2+ZCdG+4\r
+0Vuujh2A6jPVI319LTtGIlFJ+GZpH8klMZLt3G4C6eD6v1isxxXX/sAv8+oFggxH\r
+YWglnJZoQv8NRwSVl7AiIG4bFAoqKOThAPlsn2WZ8JVxJtQ7FKi6wDVb80iKv2Qq\r
+sx28xqMpdQ4NuvlfOknXvLRUuLTVDGp8MGEiESZmJQK8dHZoWQRSxtB/xdvBDT4v\r
+ytqY10DcFXbmB8l9oW9QjyK1Y4aTeJ5NNPJMv+UirK6M0fKGx9+zgaCg9+hfiDYm\r
+zmtfOaZs38iXKHEMp1ZX\r
+=Uq/6\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+--=-=-=--\r
projects / notmuch-archives.git / commitdiff