Re: notmuch Digest, Vol 20, Issue 57

diff --git a/99/6b2c00a2a806c6aa46945e83f391bebf8a7b1d b/99/6b2c00a2a806c6aa46945e83f391bebf8a7b1d
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..2544385
--- /dev/null
+++ b/99/6b2c00a2a806c6aa46945e83f391bebf8a7b1d
@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
+Return-Path: <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11BBC421192\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 00:25:05 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.09\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.09 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,\r
+       RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id PU1X6+4OksrG for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Thu, 30 Jun 2011 00:25:03 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from homiemail-a20.g.dreamhost.com (caiajhbdccah.dreamhost.com\r
+       [208.97.132.207])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F268042119B\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 00:25:02 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from homiemail-a20.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by homiemail-a20.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7307A7EC074;\r
+       Thu, 30 Jun 2011 00:25:02 -0700 (PDT)\r
+DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=SSpaeth.de; h=from:to:subject\r
+       :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version:\r
+       content-type; q=dns; s=sspaeth.de; b=n5YO0lDPt0ELmY9M0IU2uelYe1m\r
+       U7IHpR4/EVWQq32RdIADaDXyymbwYVDEmgoIyp4E1jy/x4FvKZF0CZu0XNGpjgMN\r
+       RkMce25b0EDFJZuoCP3Kd6wn1D1C1XH4lyzOsCxHX+vFt34qANweRuz6U/21/Z+2\r
+       a3e7d9felS2TrGsw=\r
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=SSpaeth.de; h=from:to\r
+       :subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version:\r
+       content-type; s=sspaeth.de; bh=KPjmgKeq7WT+jkbKyv0q+5V1iIw=; b=A\r
+       uadHcyxJJJtx6GY6VIdmd8IHtifDN4QjpuHZbyUMOJi8gQ3WC9chxK2JqnrmjTBD\r
+       bg8kOFUsQpr6/1bcOXcNwwk3rUu2v69gJknpQpeUC9Xosux+nRgbC+6I3coKjo7U\r
+       0wcHXiGG5/jIhGaFcP3lEz5PHOsU4WoQRt7GlA9IaM=\r
+Received: from spaetzbook.sspaeth.de (unknown [62.48.118.215])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       (Authenticated sender: fax@sspaeth.de)\r
+       by homiemail-a20.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A68B67EC072; \r
+       Thu, 30 Jun 2011 00:25:00 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by spaetzbook.sspaeth.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation);\r
+       Thu, 30 Jun 2011 09:24:58 +0200\r
+From: Sebastian Spaeth <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>\r
+To: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>, Sander Boer <sanderboer@mauc.nl>,\r
+       notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: notmuch Digest, Vol 20, Issue 57\r
+In-Reply-To: <87wrg5905c.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>\r
+References: <mailman.5.1309146869.12973.notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+       <cuozkl367o2.fsf@mauc.nl> <87wrg5905c.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5-233-gb404931 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.2.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 09:24:57 +0200\r
+Message-ID: <87wrg3pyra.fsf@SSpaeth.de>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
+       micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 07:25:05 -0000\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+\r
+On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 13:22:23 -0700, Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org> wrote:\r
+> First, it's important to understand that any friction here comes from\r
+> Gmail exposing its tags as folders, (which in turn could be the lack of\r
+> availability of a more tag-aware protocol than imap).\r
+\r
+Even risking to become a bit thread-offtopic: IMAP itself supports tags\r
+just fine and should be able to read/set/search all tags just fine (even\r
+any user defined). My feeling is more that this is a lack of tag-using\r
+IMAP clients to expose existing tag functionality. Thunderbird is doing\r
+fine exposing up to 4 user-defined tags that are synced to the server,\r
+but it's still not doing all it can.\r
+\r
+I still believe that it would be possible to eg. sync all our notmuch\r
+tags to the IMAP server, which would help enormously with syncing across\r
+machines. I still have the long-term goal of offlineimap being able to sync\r
+notmuch tags. (very long term, though)\r
+\r
+As for Gmail and folders, I think it is an ugly kludge leading to all\r
+kinds of awkward behavior (at least when treating Gmail as an IMAP\r
+server). On the other hand it exposes nice tag behavior to clients that\r
+wouldn't support it.\r
+\r
+Sebastian\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)\r
+\r
+iEYEARECAAYFAk4MJMoACgkQVYX1jMgnoGIWOACffVVXybmjNo/Y7oSh8b24ELkg\r
+tIsAnRd5uzPtnfNVNncOqDeuK0k9X5P8\r
+=zYa8\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+--=-=-=--\r