Re: [PATCH] [RFC] emacs: merge overhauled `notmuch-cycle-notmuch-buffers' into `notmuch'

diff --git a/57/21868424a03d00c519ab54cee4f7bb5c05cb67 b/57/21868424a03d00c519ab54cee4f7bb5c05cb67
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..d9044e6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/57/21868424a03d00c519ab54cee4f7bb5c05cb67
@@ -0,0 +1,92 @@
+Return-Path: <pieter@praet.org>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 840B6431FAF\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 08:47:34 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.7\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id bpG84vMZk5Kl for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Mon, 16 Jan 2012 08:47:18 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from mail-ww0-f45.google.com (mail-ww0-f45.google.com\r
+ [74.125.82.45])       (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))        (No client\r
+ certificate requested)        by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id\r
+ 589EA431FAE   for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 08:47:18 -0800\r
+ (PST)\r
+Received: by wgbdr13 with SMTP id dr13so398317wgb.2\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 08:47:15 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: by 10.180.106.202 with SMTP id gw10mr20189066wib.3.1326732435843;\r
+       Mon, 16 Jan 2012 08:47:15 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from localhost ([109.131.75.86])\r
+       by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ek1sm12329788wib.10.2012.01.16.08.47.14\r
+       (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);\r
+       Mon, 16 Jan 2012 08:47:15 -0800 (PST)\r
+From: Pieter Praet <pieter@praet.org>\r
+To: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>, Austin Clements <amdragon@MIT.EDU>\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] emacs: merge overhauled\r
+       `notmuch-cycle-notmuch-buffers' into `notmuch'\r
+In-Reply-To: <cun1uqz50p4.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>\r
+References: <cunpqek597g.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>\r
+       <1326710551-23122-1-git-send-email-pieter@praet.org>\r
+       <cunvcob52ku.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>\r
+       <87wr8rc2ex.fsf@praet.org>\r
+       <cun1uqz50p4.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11+78~g6c58370 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1\r
+       (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 17:45:25 +0100\r
+Message-ID: <87r4yza95m.fsf@praet.org>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+Cc: Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 16:47:34 -0000\r
+\r
+On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:47:03 +0000, David Edmondson <dme@dme.org> wrote:\r
+> On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 12:28:06 +0100, Pieter Praet <pieter@praet.org> wrote:\r
+> > Perhaps we could use `ido-completion-help', like Org-mode does with\r
+> > `org-iswitchb' ?  OTOH, that would require an extra [RET].  Bah...\r
+> \r
+> I'm a no-ido person.\r
+> \r
+> > > Hmm, yes, that seems reasonable.\r
+> > > \r
+> > > > FYI: causes 2 compile warnings due to requiring the cl package at runtime.\r
+> > > \r
+> > > `cl' is still `eval-when-compile' though - won't that break?\r
+> > \r
+> > Haven't noticed any issues here, apart from the complaints @ compilation.\r
+> \r
+> If you load the compiled lisp into 'emacs -Q' and then attempt to call\r
+> the function, it doesn't complain? (I haven't tested.)\r
+\r
+Good call !  No joy:\r
+  Debugger entered--Lisp error: (void-function remove-if-not)\r
+\r
+Should've known.\r
+\r
+So let's just get rid of that cl requirement, shall we :)\r
+\r
+Patch follows.\r
+\r
+\r
+Peace\r
+\r
+-- \r
+Pieter\r