Re: Feature suggestion. Indexing encrypted mail?

diff --git a/8b/ee67566a5b554e6dc000c85fb51fb19a62ff9d b/8b/ee67566a5b554e6dc000c85fb51fb19a62ff9d
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..c8162bc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/8b/ee67566a5b554e6dc000c85fb51fb19a62ff9d
@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
+Return-Path: <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B3C1431FB6\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon,  7 Apr 2014 08:57:40 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -2.3\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id 6ceaRwXLp74m for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Mon,  7 Apr 2014 08:57:36 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu\r
+       [131.215.239.19])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B96C6431FBC\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon,  7 Apr 2014 08:57:36 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from earth-doxen.imss.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by earth-doxen-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A4C766E01C7;\r
+       Mon,  7 Apr 2014 08:57:36 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-IMSS on earth-doxen by amavisd-new\r
+Received: from finestructure.net (cpe-107-185-189-81.socal.res.rr.com\r
+       [107.185.189.81]) (Authenticated sender: jrollins)\r
+       by earth-doxen-submit (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56B2A66E0178;\r
+       Mon,  7 Apr 2014 08:57:32 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by finestructure.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)\r
+       id 06BF060187; Mon,  7 Apr 2014 08:57:32 -0700 (PDT)\r
+From: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+To: john.wyzer@gmx.de, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>,\r
+       Guyzmo <guyzmo+notmuch@m0g.net>\r
+Subject: Re: Feature suggestion. Indexing encrypted mail?\r
+In-Reply-To: <867g71y327.fsf@someserver.somewhere>\r
+References: <86k3b3ybo6.fsf@someserver.somewhere>\r
+       <878urj1z3j.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>\r
+       <87txa7pp8z.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+       <20140406091516.GG26903@vilya.m0g.net>\r
+       <5341D252.90405@fifthhorseman.net>\r
+       <867g71y327.fsf@someserver.somewhere>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.17+174~gaa1f476 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2014 08:57:27 -0700\r
+Message-ID: <87ob0dnndk.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
+       micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
+Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@debian.org>\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2014 15:57:40 -0000\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+\r
+On Mon, Apr 07 2014, john.wyzer@gmx.de wrote:\r
+>> confess i haven't been following closely), it wouldn't be much extra\r
+>> effort for someone to implement a filter that strips encryption from the\r
+>> message.  (this might still have the problem mentioned above about also\r
+>> stripping PGP/MIME signatures, but the signatures and the decrypted\r
+>> message itself would remain intact so they could be shown directly by\r
+>> notmuch show without trouble).\r
+>\r
+> I don't understand that. :-(\r
+> This sounds as if the view of the message is not generated from the\r
+> mail storage. Isn't the purpose of the index to find the appropriate\r
+> message file and everything else is generated from that file?\r
+\r
+I think that's exactly what Daniel is saying: what's viewed comes from\r
+the message directly, and not from the db.\r
+\r
+jamie.\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1\r
+\r
+iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJTQsroAAoJEO00zqvie6q8aYwP/Rk0R7BW8vQd+VtvzWYC1N9j\r
+uC32nGscmg17Pwr0Sky6/cIniO+WoESV77HmD7T4MJNEXwRqQxOc34V8NZ4Qa4PP\r
+jlal8DkePkrgjvTWegXgIEQ9i0mpq4/TJjQ0xXgKPPr6xIuIJc+7KrasYt9y7LWQ\r
+qMq63FEjvoTWYxv0Eb3fQoFQ2DueJxtP/DPGQjRqYspmitCKMhW/AQkM/XgEjSx/\r
+Nnu4ofC3R/Jk3uIEOKxO+TFKrB/Y/3jsr9cG696OO3/eNgY9QIm9hvWTcCdNQZTe\r
+zLdk8RMkS06M4LgORaULx/qXhPQeMZiY1UXTn8RBMtmwShQj5yVLpvC/+llJbz5G\r
+b+ZeKeQmGWFMtj3iVA5y9mTLbG2uoGOYDlD8YWs8BweabQGQxtzO7aIcOzBuUy/A\r
+QG5LV+nCJRjT48LoahTna2nmT39sfHvkmrimrCgnPgllLeoq49HpevL0UUVIM3b2\r
+RSStinJe3JZFBfQHlLCF2ziXWcI36ardJoEcLRtQG1+qC53O4cW7s71CrEt4JsIF\r
+fNWeR6EGiVfv5a9zFby9KJKT3f/kKM4gNTkCloIi+xPL6T55iFx8ioh6oDlJvSoN\r
+OJDigVPjICypfcHtkt/sIjPVSnmTsbwXZteMJ9QSAKUz+YxPmCWXGHfrI5l/tTLn\r
+Ka+ax1bWu8yeRgJ/vZFT\r
+=tdO0\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+--=-=-=--\r