Re: [PATCH 0/7] cli: notmuch new improvements

diff --git a/44/15e96ca66d196f713b8c70b75d59515c019d3c b/44/15e96ca66d196f713b8c70b75d59515c019d3c
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..d0294e2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/44/15e96ca66d196f713b8c70b75d59515c019d3c
@@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
+Return-Path: <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AE19431FB6\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 25 Jan 2014 00:41:39 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -1.098\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,\r
+       NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id z0MsL1vFKd6d for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Sat, 25 Jan 2014 00:41:31 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from mail2.qmul.ac.uk (mail2.qmul.ac.uk [138.37.6.6])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D07BE431FBC\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 25 Jan 2014 00:41:30 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from smtp.qmul.ac.uk ([138.37.6.40])\r
+       by mail2.qmul.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.71)\r
+       (envelope-from <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>)\r
+       id 1W6yno-0005pO-7d; Sat, 25 Jan 2014 08:41:22 +0000\r
+Received: from 93-97-24-31.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.24.31] helo=localhost)\r
+       by smtp.qmul.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.71)\r
+       (envelope-from <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>)\r
+       id 1W6ymu-0006pO-Sd; Sat, 25 Jan 2014 08:40:25 +0000\r
+From: Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>\r
+To: Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] cli: notmuch new improvements\r
+In-Reply-To: <cover.1390163335.git.jani@nikula.org>\r
+References: <cover.1390163335.git.jani@nikula.org>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.15.2+484~gfb59956 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2014 08:38:59 +0000\r
+Message-ID: <87ppnga21o.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+X-Sender-Host-Address: 93.97.24.31\r
+X-QM-Geographic: According to ripencc,\r
+       this message was delivered by a machine in Britain (UK) (GB).\r
+X-QM-SPAM-Info: Sender has good ham record.  :)\r
+X-QM-Body-MD5: 550d19702d099cd9b0ad9441b7d84148 (of first 20000 bytes)\r
+X-SpamAssassin-Score: 0.0\r
+X-SpamAssassin-SpamBar: /\r
+X-SpamAssassin-Report: The QM spam filters have analysed this message to\r
+       determine if it is\r
+       spam. We require at least 5.0 points to mark a message as spam.\r
+       This message scored 0.0 points. Summary of the scoring: \r
+       * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail\r
+       provider *      (markwalters1009[at]gmail.com)\r
+       *  0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list\r
+X-QM-Scan-Virus: ClamAV says the message is clean\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2014 08:41:39 -0000\r
+\r
+\r
+This series LGTM.\r
+\r
+I do now recall there was some discussion on irc about the automatic\r
+database upgrade: it would be good to have that documented but the\r
+consensus was to do it, so +1 from me.\r
+\r
+Best wishes\r
+\r
+Mark\r
+\r
+\r
+\r
+\r
+On Sun, 19 Jan 2014, Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org> wrote:\r
+> Here's an assortment of notmuch new fixes, non-functional cleanups, and\r
+> the oft-requested --quiet option.\r
+>\r
+> These should be pretty straightforward to review.\r
+>\r
+> BR,\r
+> Jani.\r
+>\r
+>\r
+> Jani Nikula (7):\r
+>   cli: extract single message addition in notmuch new to clarify code\r
+>   cli: only check the ignore list if needed\r
+>   cli: use dirent_type in count_files too\r
+>   cli: for loop is more customary\r
+>   cli: abstract notmuch new result printing\r
+>   cli: add --quiet option to notmuch new\r
+>   man: document notmuch new --quiet option\r
+>\r
+>  man/man1/notmuch-new.1 |   5 +\r
+>  notmuch-new.c          | 253 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------\r
+>  2 files changed, 137 insertions(+), 121 deletions(-)\r
+>\r
+> -- \r
+> 1.8.5.2\r
+>\r
+> _______________________________________________\r
+> notmuch mailing list\r
+> notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+> http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch\r