Re: including the entire fingerprint of the issuer in an OpenPGP certification
authorDavid Shaw <dshaw@jabberwocky.com>
Tue, 18 Jan 2011 03:22:57 +0000 (22:22 +1900)
committerW. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
Fri, 7 Nov 2014 17:37:43 +0000 (09:37 -0800)
6e/443554210b733e9001d35cad799efca2da3a2a [new file with mode: 0644]

diff --git a/6e/443554210b733e9001d35cad799efca2da3a2a b/6e/443554210b733e9001d35cad799efca2da3a2a
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..f551db9
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
+Return-Path: <dshaw@jabberwocky.com>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D144431FB6\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 19:54:55 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]\r
+       autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id UsOJPYi6XUUg for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Mon, 17 Jan 2011 19:54:55 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Greylist: delayed 1912 seconds by postgrey-1.32 at olra;\r
+       Mon, 17 Jan 2011 19:54:54 PST\r
+Received: from walrus.jabberwocky.com (walrus.jabberwocky.com [173.9.29.57])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4387431FB5\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 19:54:54 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from grover.home.jabberwocky.com (grover.home.jabberwocky.com\r
+       [172.24.84.28]) (authenticated bits=0)\r
+       by walrus.jabberwocky.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p0I3MvV1011930\r
+       (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO);\r
+       Mon, 17 Jan 2011 22:22:58 -0500\r
+Subject: Re: including the entire fingerprint of the issuer in an OpenPGP\r
+       certification\r
+Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+From: David Shaw <dshaw@jabberwocky.com>\r
+In-Reply-To: <4D34F133.3000807@fifthhorseman.net>\r
+Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 22:22:57 -0500\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
+Message-Id: <2885367E-D215-4BE7-983D-C82C55C64B0F@jabberwocky.com>\r
+References: <4D34F133.3000807@fifthhorseman.net>\r
+To: IETF OpenPGP Working Group <ietf-openpgp@imc.org>\r
+X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)\r
+X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 12:27:17 -0800\r
+Cc: notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 03:54:55 -0000\r
+\r
+On Jan 17, 2011, at 8:47 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:\r
+\r
+> Would there be any objection to a new subpacket type for OpenPGPv4 =\r
+that\r
+> would include the remaining 96 bits of the issuer's fingerprint?  (the\r
+> "high 96" proposal)\r
+>=20\r
+> Alternately, what about a new subpacket type that simply includes the\r
+> entire 160 bits of the issuer's fingerprint?   (the "full fingerprint"\r
+> proposal)\r
+\r
+I like this idea.  I would do it as "full fingerprint" myself.  The =\r
+difference in storage between 160 bits and 96 bits is all of 8 bytes.  I =\r
+think the simplicity of being able to say the whole fingerprint is in =\r
+there is worth a measly 8 bytes.\r
+\r
+Do we necessarily need a new subpacket type for this?  It could pretty =\r
+easily be a notation.\r
+\r
+David\r
+\r