Re: [PATCH v3 15/16] added notmuch_message_reindex

diff --git a/ae/7d2be5a66376f926239e0323a3e0dc5e7fc296 b/ae/7d2be5a66376f926239e0323a3e0dc5e7fc296
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..45f7565
--- /dev/null
+++ b/ae/7d2be5a66376f926239e0323a3e0dc5e7fc296
@@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
+Return-Path: <david@tethera.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8968A6DE0AF8\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 10:14:03 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.307\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.307 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.244,\r
+  RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.55, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id o2aZzqJPi3xV for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Sat, 13 Feb 2016 10:14:01 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from fethera.tethera.net (fethera.tethera.net [198.245.60.197])\r
+ by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D76F6DE0A9A\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 10:14:01 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from remotemail by fethera.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.84)\r
+ (envelope-from <david@tethera.net>)\r
+ id 1aUeh2-00054V-JL; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 13:13:16 -0500\r
+Received: (nullmailer pid 22350 invoked by uid 1000);\r
+ Sat, 13 Feb 2016 18:13:56 -0000\r
+From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>\r
+To: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>,\r
+ Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>,\r
+ Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+Cc: Austin Clements <amdragon@gmail.com>\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 15/16] added notmuch_message_reindex\r
+In-Reply-To: <871t8ko50r.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net>\r
+References: <1454272801-23623-1-git-send-email-dkg@fifthhorseman.net>\r
+ <1454272801-23623-16-git-send-email-dkg@fifthhorseman.net>\r
+ <87mvr9s8gy.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+ <87oabpnzt4.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net>\r
+ <871t8ko50r.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.21+26~g9404723 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1\r
+ (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2016 14:13:56 -0400\r
+Message-ID: <87mvr47a1n.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2016 18:14:03 -0000\r
+\r
+Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net> writes:\r
+\r
+>\r
+> I think when a message is removed from the database, we need to know\r
+> whether anything else (in its same thread?) refers to it.  If so, we\r
+> should keep it around as a ghost message instead of fully removing it.\r
+>\r
+> does this sound like the right approach?\r
+>\r
+\r
+This seems right to me, but maybe Austin, in copy, can comment.\r
+\r
+d\r