--- /dev/null
+Return-Path: <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0F9940D162\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 06:01:38 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -1.9\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+ tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=unavailable\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id neRKuF43FMZ6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Sat, 30 Oct 2010 06:01:38 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from max.feld.cvut.cz (max.feld.cvut.cz [147.32.192.36])\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C9A940D168\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 06:01:26 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from localhost (unknown [192.168.200.4])\r
+ by max.feld.cvut.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id E606C19F331A;\r
+ Sat, 30 Oct 2010 15:01:24 +0200 (CEST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: IMAP AMAVIS\r
+Received: from max.feld.cvut.cz ([192.168.200.1])\r
+ by localhost (styx.feld.cvut.cz [192.168.200.4]) (amavisd-new,\r
+ port 10044)\r
+ with ESMTP id GinE-NXTZOlP; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 15:01:23 +0200 (CEST)\r
+Received: from imap.feld.cvut.cz (imap.feld.cvut.cz [147.32.192.34])\r
+ by max.feld.cvut.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AA1A19F32FD;\r
+ Sat, 30 Oct 2010 15:01:23 +0200 (CEST)\r
+Received: from wsheee.2x.cz (charon.finaltek.com [217.11.241.201])\r
+ (Authenticated sender: sojkam1)\r
+ by imap.feld.cvut.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4C23AFA005;\r
+ Sat, 30 Oct 2010 15:01:23 +0200 (CEST)\r
+Received: from wsh by wsheee.2x.cz with local (Exim 4.72)\r
+ (envelope-from <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>)\r
+ id 1PCAcX-0004ho-ES; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 14:33:17 +0200\r
+From: Michal Sojka <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>\r
+To: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>, Igor Shenderovich <shender.i@gmail.com>,\r
+ notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: utf-8 in author field\r
+In-Reply-To: <87pquspm6c.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>\r
+References: <AANLkTilbzkZSQ0fJd_xtA6gq1QbitGgKA8sV3Mt_uoYv@mail.gmail.com>\r
+ <87vdanrmfo.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz>\r
+ <87pquspm6c.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.3.1-113-g782e2e3 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.2.1\r
+ (i486-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 14:33:17 +0200\r
+Message-ID: <87ocabvp0y.fsf@wsheee.2x.cz>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-="\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 13:01:39 -0000\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+\r
+On Sat, 30 Oct 2010, Carl Worth wrote:\r
+> On Mon, 17 May 2010 09:56:27 +0200, Michal Sojka <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz> wrote:\r
+> > On Fri, 14 May 2010, Igor Shenderovich wrote:\r
+> > > What should one do to see the true list of authors?\r
+> > \r
+> > I encounter the same when headers are not encoded properly according to\r
+> > RFC 2047. I commonly see the violation of section 5, paragraph (3),\r
+> > sentence "An 'encoded-word' MUST NOT appear within a 'quoted-string'".\r
+> > That is when the encoded word is enclosed in double quotes. I guess, the\r
+> > "problem" is not only notmuch related, but all users of gmime library\r
+> > must be affected.\r
+> [...]\r
+> My guess is that the best we could do is to come up with some heuristics\r
+> for recognizing a non-RFC-compliant header here and munging it. And the\r
+> heuristics could then fail with messages that were RFC-compliant and\r
+> intentionally including a string of characters that would match the\r
+> heuristic, (which would presumably be rare, but not impossible---so\r
+> perhaps we would then need some configuration).\r
+\r
+I think that other, more mature, users of gmime library (Evolution?)\r
+must use such heuristics. We may look for insporation there.\r
+\r
+> Anyway, if one of you could send an example of a misbehaving message, I\r
+> might like to look at it and perhaps add it to the test suite to see if\r
+> there's anything we can safely do about it.\r
+\r
+I attach one such message.\r
+\r
+-Michal\r
+\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: message/rfc822\r
+Content-Disposition: inline;\r
+ filename*0*=us-ascii''1288208842_5.30413.wsheee%2cU%3d8900%2cFMD5%3d3a8e4;\r
+ filename*1*=c06e471595f6eb262bb9b5582d9%3a2%2cS\r
+\r
+Return-Path: <bounce-debian-devel=sojkam1=fel.cvut.cz@lists.debian.org>\r
+X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.3\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: IMAP AMAVIS\r
+Received: from liszt.debian.org (liszt.debian.org [82.195.75.100])\r
+ by max.feld.cvut.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C01619F3380\r
+ for <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 16:01:49 +0200 (CEST)\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by liszt.debian.org (Postfix) with QMQP\r
+ id 3EF7A13A4FE5; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 14:01:37 +0000 (UTC)\r
+Old-Return-Path: <jesus.navarro@undominio.net>\r
+X-Original-To: lists-debian-devel@liszt.debian.org\r
+Delivered-To: lists-debian-devel@liszt.debian.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by liszt.debian.org (Postfix)\r
+ with ESMTP id D913813A4A7D for <lists-debian-devel@liszt.debian.org>; Wed, 27\r
+ Oct 2010 14:01:30 +0000 (UTC)\r
+X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-12 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3\r
+ tests=[BAYES_00=-2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, STATIC_RIMA_TDE=-5]\r
+ autolearn=ham\r
+Received: from liszt.debian.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (lists.debian.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 2525)\r
+ with ESMTP id obJuGli7s+tD for <lists-debian-devel@liszt.debian.org>;\r
+ Wed, 27 Oct 2010 14:01:23 +0000 (UTC)\r
+X-policyd-weight: using cached result; rate: -6.1\r
+Received: from mithrandir.undominio.net (65.Red-88-2-199.staticIP.rima-tde.net\r
+ [88.2.199.65]) by liszt.debian.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A35B13A48D3 for\r
+ <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 14:01:10 +0000 (UTC)\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by mithrandir.undominio.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 956C925C249\r
+ for <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 16:01:07 +0200 (CEST)\r
+Received: from mithrandir.undominio.net ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (mithrandir.undominio.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with LMTP id zcCCG1n+oJfZ for <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>;\r
+ Wed, 27 Oct 2010 16:01:06 +0200 (CEST)\r
+Received: from mithrandir.undominio.prv (mithrandir.undominio.prv\r
+ [192.168.0.1]) by mithrandir.undominio.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id\r
+ E2CF925C23C for <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 16:01:06\r
+ +0200 (CEST)\r
+From: "=?utf-8?q?Jes=C3=BAs_M=2E?= Navarro" <jesus.navarro@undominio.net>\r
+To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org\r
+Subject: Re: debian can be better\r
+Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 16:01:06 +0200\r
+User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9\r
+References: <BAY156-w2268DDE9E2D29244F2B153E1430@phx.gbl>\r
+In-Reply-To: <BAY156-w2268DDE9E2D29244F2B153E1430@phx.gbl>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain;\r
+ charset="utf-8"\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit\r
+Content-Disposition: inline\r
+Message-Id: <201010271601.06645.jesus.navarro@undominio.net>\r
+X-Rc-Virus: 2007-09-13_01\r
+X-Rc-Spam: 2008-11-04_01\r
+Resent-Message-ID: <hUyeaadzytO.A.ajB.BDDyMB@liszt>\r
+Resent-From: debian-devel@lists.debian.org\r
+X-Mailing-List: <debian-devel@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/266059\r
+X-Loop: debian-devel@lists.debian.org\r
+List-Id: <debian-devel.lists.debian.org>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:debian-devel@lists.debian.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe:\r
+ <mailto:debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+List-Unsubscribe:\r
+ <mailto:debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+Precedence: list\r
+Resent-Sender: debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org\r
+Resent-Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 14:01:37 +0000 (UTC)\r
+\r
+Hi, Pedro Paolo:\r
+\r
+On Wednesday 27 October 2010 14:46:08 Pedro Paulo Argolo wrote:\r
+> Debian\r
+> needs better support video cards from Nvidia and ATI video boards\r
+> Intel. I had configuration problems because of that, and for a typical\r
+> user is a very embarrassing situation. ~: (\r
+\r
+You should ask for that to Nvidia. You can bet the day Nvidia produces proper \r
+open source drivers will be the day Debian will be able to properly support \r
+them.\r
+\r
+Of course you can think the Ubuntu way is the proper one and Debian's[1] is \r
+not but, of course too, you are absolutly free to use Ubuntu instead of \r
+Debian.\r
+\r
+Cheers.\r
+\r
+[1] http://www.debian.org/social_contract\r
+\r
+\r
+-- \r
+To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org\r
+with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org\r
+Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201010271601.06645.jesus.navarro@undominio.net\r
+\r
+\r
+--=-=-=--\r
projects / notmuch-archives.git / commitdiff