Re: release-candidate/0.6

diff --git a/67/81a4e0095fe10b99273571954a6c6756a88ed5 b/67/81a4e0095fe10b99273571954a6c6756a88ed5
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..a2e3259
--- /dev/null
+++ b/67/81a4e0095fe10b99273571954a6c6756a88ed5
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+Return-Path: <vasile@softwarefreedom.org>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51E1D429E21\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri,  6 May 2011 16:56:33 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]\r
+       autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id 8Z8uBXtPDiXo for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Fri,  6 May 2011 16:56:33 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from mail.sflc.info (mail.sflc.info [216.27.154.199])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D21F0431FB5\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri,  6 May 2011 16:56:32 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from localhost (ool-4572ad3c.dyn.optonline.net [69.114.173.60])\r
+       by mail.sflc.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A8DDFB4C03B;\r
+       Fri,  6 May 2011 23:56:29 +0000 (UTC)\r
+From: James Vasile <james@hackervisions.org>\r
+To: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>,\r
+       Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+Subject: Re: release-candidate/0.6\r
+In-Reply-To: <8762pn7gth.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net>\r
+References: <8762pn7gth.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5-216-g76ea9ab (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.2.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Fri, 06 May 2011 19:56:30 -0400\r
+Message-ID: <87bozfpemp.fsf@softwarefreedom.org>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 May 2011 23:56:33 -0000\r
+\r
+Thanks for pulling this together.\r
+\r
+I sent two patches to the list on March 16.  They were a bug fix to\r
+allow notmuch to correctly handle some poorly formatted email.  Nobody\r
+ever replied, but I'd like to see the bug fixed nonetheless, as it\r
+results in unreadable mail.  Since I've actually seen such mail in the\r
+wild, I'd like to see Notmuch handle it.\r
+\r
+Those messages were:\r
+\r
+Message-ID: <87ipvifrlv.fsf@softwarefreedom.org>\r
+Message-ID: <87fwqmfr2x.fsf@softwarefreedom.org>\r
+\r
+Thanks,\r
+James\r